|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I've seen less contact called an F1 Hook & Hold than what Duke #12 did on UCF #35; that was unfortunately a miss.
UCF #15 does a really bad job on boxing out. The ball bounces outward from the rim. The C and L would have a closed look on any obvious contact by Duke #5. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I wouldn't call the push nonexistent, but it was a terrible effort of the UCF player.
|
|
|||
Play 1: 50/50 foul but defender jumps first and compromises position. Need faster whistle though.
Play 2: Absolutely not a PC on Zion. CC on grounded RA play on Tacko. Play 3: CNC. Interesting to note that if Tacko deflects the inbound pass the rule changes and there would no longer be a back court exception. Important for the Trail to pay attention to whether the ball was deflected and also for the Lead to have awareness to call this play if Trail does not. Play 4: Marginal push in the back on Slot side rebounding, given the time/score in that situation. Could see a hook and hold foul on the Lead side rebounder. |
|
|||
1. This is a tough call if you think he was going to finish with his outside hand anyway then contact is marginal let shot blockers be shot blockers. If you fee like he was going up with 2 or lost the ability to finish with his inside hand because a 260+ pound man is on and through his inside arm then I'm ok with it going to the line. Felt late to go with the foul but I'm ok either way.
2. This looks too much like the one he got called for earlier to not get the PC on the first contact. For consistency no call both or get both Official got the rule right with RA and grounded on Tacko. 3. Looks odd but we are all good. 4. It certainly doesn't look like he pushes him hard, but why on the most important rebound of your life would the player jump under the rim and basket to board the ball. Feel like their was displacement there based on what I'm seeing.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
|||
Quote:
I have not seen a single "hook and hold" like that called an F1 at the D1 level all year. And I know as a small college official, we tried to avoid that call on plays like this. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Not much to see or learn from there. Ball didn't obviously hit the rim, the call on the floor stood.
Gotta agree with you on this one, this action however brief looked like every video JD put out this year addressing the hook and hold. |
|
|||
Quote:
The crew stops the game to review if the previous attempt was a shot clock violation. From what I know, a shot clock review can be done after the original FG is made; they have to stop the game immediately to check if the shot was released in time. In this case, the original shot was missed but deemed to have hit the rim. The subsequent FG attempt (the 2nd shot) was made by UCF thus making the previous (alleged) shot clock violation non-reviewable. Please correct me if I'm wrong; thanks. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Duke/UNC | eyezen | Basketball | 42 | Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:48am |
Duke vs. UNC | IREFU2 | Basketball | 21 | Wed Mar 08, 2006 04:19pm |
VT vs. Duke | brandan89 | Basketball | 16 | Tue Feb 01, 2005 04:28pm |
Duke UNC | Dan_ref | Basketball | 21 | Sun Feb 08, 2004 01:55pm |
UVA vs Duke | Suppref | Basketball | 15 | Sat Feb 17, 2001 09:51am |