|  | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			While the penalty doesn't enumerate all of the cases, it is an oversight, not a declaration that one or both of these violations shouldn't be penalized. It is, in principle, the same as the case you describe.
		 
				__________________ Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			It's exactly that. It is treated as a simultaneous violation and it goes to the AP per NCAA. In camps I've attended it was always taught as a violation by 1 in the box and 1 outside the box is simultaneous and thus AP. In the box always referred to the players lined up around the key but NOT the shooter.
		 | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			Don't cases cover this? If defense violates first, then ignore offensive violation. Case 9.1.3 Sit C. I know the case cites two along the lane line. Defense is still one violating first even if coming from beyond 3-pt. arc. And... "Double violation. B's delayed violation is still a violation. It doesn't go away just because A violates too. A's makes the ball dead. This is no different than B violating and the shooter subsequently violating." The Case book specifically indicates to consider disconcertion. 
				__________________ If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?   | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			Rule should be rewritten to take out 'Simultaneous' and insert 'Double. Who out there has ever had simultaneous free throw violations? However,  we do occasionally have double violations, meaning a violation by the defensive team followed by a violation by the offensive team. Exceptions are already written into the rule.
		 | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			But not all of them. There are four cases (and in all of these, the defense violates first): a) Both players on the lane -- enforce the first (penalty a) b) Defense on the lane, offense not on the lane -- enforce both (penalty b) c) Defense on on the lane, offense not on the lane -- enforce both (penalty b) d) Defense not on the lane, offense on the lane -- not covered | 
|  | 
| Bookmarks | 
| 
 |  | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| TD or incomplete? | JugglingReferee | Football | 0 | Sun Sep 11, 2016 01:21pm | 
| Do you have to think about incomplete "shovel" passes? | Texas Aggie | Football | 15 | Tue Oct 25, 2005 03:32pm | 
| incomplete pass signal | TriggerMN | Football | 22 | Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18am | 
| Incomplete or a fumble? | Warrenkicker | Football | 10 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:00pm | 
| Incomplete or Illegal Participation? | insatty | Football | 13 | Thu Nov 14, 2002 04:45pm |