The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 18, 2018, 07:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
Why would this NOT be a simultaneous violation? How is it different from B1 entering the lane early, followed by A1's try failing to hit the rim?
While the penalty doesn't enumerate all of the cases, it is an oversight, not a declaration that one or both of these violations shouldn't be penalized. It is, in principle, the same as the case you describe.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 19, 2018, 03:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 133
It's exactly that. It is treated as a simultaneous violation and it goes to the AP per NCAA. In camps I've attended it was always taught as a violation by 1 in the box and 1 outside the box is simultaneous and thus AP. In the box always referred to the players lined up around the key but NOT the shooter.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 19, 2018, 08:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
Don't cases cover this? If defense violates first, then ignore offensive violation. Case 9.1.3 Sit C. I know the case cites two along the lane line. Defense is still one violating first even if coming from beyond 3-pt. arc.

And...

"Double violation. B's delayed violation is still a violation. It doesn't go away just because A violates too. A's makes the ball dead. This is no different than B violating and the shooter subsequently violating." The Case book specifically indicates to consider disconcertion.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 19, 2018, 10:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 11
Rule should be rewritten to take out 'Simultaneous' and insert 'Double. Who out there has ever had simultaneous free throw violations? However, we do occasionally have double violations, meaning a violation by the defensive team followed by a violation by the offensive team. Exceptions are already written into the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 20, 2018, 08:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Martin View Post
Exceptions are already written into the rule.
But not all of them.

There are four cases (and in all of these, the defense violates first):

a) Both players on the lane -- enforce the first (penalty a)
b) Defense on the lane, offense not on the lane -- enforce both (penalty b)
c) Defense on on the lane, offense not on the lane -- enforce both (penalty b)
d) Defense not on the lane, offense on the lane -- not covered
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TD or incomplete? JugglingReferee Football 0 Sun Sep 11, 2016 01:21pm
Do you have to think about incomplete "shovel" passes? Texas Aggie Football 15 Tue Oct 25, 2005 03:32pm
incomplete pass signal TriggerMN Football 22 Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18am
Incomplete or a fumble? Warrenkicker Football 10 Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:00pm
Incomplete or Illegal Participation? insatty Football 13 Thu Nov 14, 2002 04:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1