![]() |
|
|||
While the penalty doesn't enumerate all of the cases, it is an oversight, not a declaration that one or both of these violations shouldn't be penalized. It is, in principle, the same as the case you describe.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
It's exactly that. It is treated as a simultaneous violation and it goes to the AP per NCAA. In camps I've attended it was always taught as a violation by 1 in the box and 1 outside the box is simultaneous and thus AP. In the box always referred to the players lined up around the key but NOT the shooter.
|
|
|||
Don't cases cover this? If defense violates first, then ignore offensive violation. Case 9.1.3 Sit C. I know the case cites two along the lane line. Defense is still one violating first even if coming from beyond 3-pt. arc.
And... "Double violation. B's delayed violation is still a violation. It doesn't go away just because A violates too. A's makes the ball dead. This is no different than B violating and the shooter subsequently violating." The Case book specifically indicates to consider disconcertion.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist? ![]() |
|
|||
Rule should be rewritten to take out 'Simultaneous' and insert 'Double. Who out there has ever had simultaneous free throw violations? However, we do occasionally have double violations, meaning a violation by the defensive team followed by a violation by the offensive team. Exceptions are already written into the rule.
|
|
|||
But not all of them.
There are four cases (and in all of these, the defense violates first): a) Both players on the lane -- enforce the first (penalty a) b) Defense on the lane, offense not on the lane -- enforce both (penalty b) c) Defense on on the lane, offense not on the lane -- enforce both (penalty b) d) Defense not on the lane, offense on the lane -- not covered |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TD or incomplete? | JugglingReferee | Football | 0 | Sun Sep 11, 2016 01:21pm |
Do you have to think about incomplete "shovel" passes? | Texas Aggie | Football | 15 | Tue Oct 25, 2005 03:32pm |
incomplete pass signal | TriggerMN | Football | 22 | Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18am |
Incomplete or a fumble? | Warrenkicker | Football | 10 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:00pm |
Incomplete or Illegal Participation? | insatty | Football | 13 | Thu Nov 14, 2002 04:45pm |