Technical Foul given during free throw administration (Video)

[nolanjj68]

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

The video doesn't show for me (there's just a hole where the video should be), so I don't know the level, but many rules codes have a T as being "shoot immediately and then resume at point-of-interruption" rule

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

Because non-contact/non-flagrant technical fouls are POI in NCAA-Men's.

[nolanjj68]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Because non-contact/non-flagrant technical fouls are POI in NCAA-Men's.

Thanks. So in NFHS we would continue with the 2nd of the 1 and 1 and then administer the Tech FTs, correct?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Thanks. So in NFHS we would continue with the 2nd of the 1 and 1 and then administer the Tech FTs, correct?

In HS, all fouls are administered in the order they occurred.

[jTheUmp]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Thanks. So in NFHS we would continue with the 2nd of the 1 and 1 and then administer the Tech FTs, correct?

Correct.

The lane would be cleared, we'd shoot the second bonus FT, then the 2 TF free throws, then a division line throw-in opposite the table.

[Raymond]

There is an obviously unnecessary push by Blue 15 during the first free throw, that's what drew the Lead's attention.

[Raymond]

Blue 15 and Blue 0 are knuckleheads who put sh!t into games. I give those type of players no slack.

[Blindolbat]

I don't know if blue 15 was ever a problem here.
It looks like from the moment they start to lineup at about the :13 mark, Blue 0 started with a little talking. Walked right up behind White 2 and White 15 and said something than appears to catch the leads attention. Once it continued into after the 1st free throw he steps in to try to defuse the situation.

[jeremy341a]

Anyone addressing the Blue #0 wave off after the T?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by jeremy341a

Anyone addressing the Blue #0 wave off after the T?

Depends on who he waved off and whether it was seen.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Blindolbat

I don't know if blue 15 was ever a problem here.
It looks like from the moment they start to lineup at about the :13 mark, Blue 0 started with a little talking. Walked right up behind White 2 and White 15 and said something than appears to catch the leads attention. Once it continued into after the 1st free throw he steps in to try to defuse the situation.

You're living up to forum name if you didn't notice the nudge by Blue #15 during the first free throw.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The video doesn't show for me (there's just a hole where the video should be), so I don't know the level, but many rules codes have a T as being "shoot immediately and then resume at point-of-interruption" rule

Around 2:12 in the video, the shows the POI second free throw was taken.

This is a typical NCAA Men's application of the rule. Almost all technicals in NCAA Men's are POI application. Dead ball contact technicals, for example, are treated like a high school in the application of the technical (two shots and the ball).

Peace