Arrow ?

[bucky]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

And remember, when the Blue HC complains about your screw up, just remind him that he is going to get two of the next three AP Arrows.

MTD, Sr.

Which is not necessarily true based on the original error.

I never really understood why this was not something that was correctable... or fixable to avoid being part of correctable errors. It is something where the right action is not correct by rule. Yes, we want to avoid slippery slope scenarios with regards to other rules but there certainly could be a fix for this specific situation. It is also a case where everyone would agree with you if you stopped play quickly and gave the ball to the "correct" team.

Follow the rules however, and just admit the mistake. Keep the game moving.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bucky

Which is not necessarily true based on the original error.

I never really understood why this was not something that was correctable... or fixable to avoid being part of correctable errors. It is something where the right action is not correct by rule. Yes, we want to avoid slippery slope scenarios with regards to other rules but there certainly could be a fix for this specific situation. It is also a case where everyone would agree with you if you stopped play quickly and gave the ball to the "correct" team.

Follow the rules however, and just admit the mistake. Keep the game moving.

Fixable/Correctable to what point?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bucky

It is also a case where everyone would agree with you if you stopped play quickly and gave the ball to the "correct" team.

That is the rule. With "quickly" being defined as "before the TI ends."

Other definitions, such as "the earlier of change of possession or the ball becoming dead then live" would work (with proper wording, of course.)