Throw In NFHS game

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by CJP

You are either in bounds or out of bounds. I am trying to understand the whole play.

It seems pretty obvious that the inbounder had either (a) one foot in bounds and one foot out of bounds, or (b) both feet on the boundary line such that each foot was touching bout inbounds and out of bounds simultaneously.

And, that while the player was out of bounds, s/he violated the throw-in criteria.

[CJP]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It seems pretty obvious that the inbounder had either (a) one foot in bounds and one foot out of bounds, or (b) both feet on the boundary line such that each foot was touching bout inbounds and out of bounds simultaneously.

And, that while the player was out of bounds, s/he violated the throw-in criteria.

If a foot is on the boundary line (not over it) during the throw in, is there a violation?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by CJP

If a foot is on the boundary line (not over it) during the throw in, is there a violation?

no

[CJP]

Originally Posted by just another ref

no

Okay. I was just making sure because my question in post #4 seems to have generated some unnecessary responses.

[UNIgiantslayers]

Originally Posted by CJP

Okay. I was just making sure because my question in post #4 seems to have generated some unnecessary responses.

You've been awfully nitpicky and unnecessarily crabby lately. Maybe try a nap.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by CJP

If a foot is on the boundary line (not over it) during the throw in, is there a violation?

It depends on whether you define "line" as the 2" (or 10" or 36" ..) "paint" on the floor, or the geometrical boundary between IB and OOB.

The entirety of any paint is OOB; the entirety of the area inside the paint is IB