Maui Invitational Video Plays (Michigan vs. LSU)

[JRutledge]

Play #1:


Play #2:


Play #3:


Play #4:


Play #5:


Play #6:


Peace

[Camron Rust]

Play 1: HS, count it. NCAA, probably not.

Play 2: Hook first...should have been offensive. the L, who can see it all should have taken it.

Play 3: Inconclusive from the video.

Play 4: Nothing to call.

Play 5: Good call. You don't have the right to knock another player off his feet in order to recover the ball, particularly one who had picked up the ball.

Play 6: Good call. Defender had 2 feet down and got in the path before shooter left the floor. In fact, he had that when the shooter was still outside of the 3-point arc and heading right towards him. He got 2 feet down again (a couple of times) but it was not necessary. The L had good position to make the decision.

(Edit...updated incorrectly numbered plays 5 & 6, added 4 that I skipped)

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Play 1: HS, count it. NCAA, probably not.
.

Why? The rule is basically the same at both levels. They got rid of upward motion some time ago.

Peace

[BigCat]

Number 1 happened quick so I can see why he might have counted it but....
he picked up the ball with left hand while stepping into/toward defender. got the contact. finishes step, moves ball to the right hand and then finally goes up. The "habitual throwing movement" hadn't started yet when the contact occurred. I don't think it should count in either set.

[bainsey]

Haven't done one of these in a while. From an NFHS mindset...

#1 I like the shooting foul here. No sense in penalizing the dribbler too soon with a quick call. See it through.
#2 I struggle to see a defensive foul here. Even if you ignore the hook (which you shouldn't, I have a PC), the defender was still moving laterally.
#3 I like the call. Defender got the ball at first, then got the arm.
#4 I prefer a slow whistle here, which means I may go incidental through all that.
#5 Charge. Defender was moving laterally.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Why? The rule is basically the same at both levels. They got rid of upward motion some time ago.

Peace

While the rule is essentially the same, the interpretations I've seen for NCAA suggest a more strict interpretation of what it takes to be in the shooting motion.

Upward motion has indeed been gone for a while but it was never about defining when the shot started. It was only about whether the defender had LGP in time or not.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

While the rule is essentially the same, the interpretations I've seen for NCAA suggest a more strict interpretation of what it takes to be in the shooting motion.

Upward motion has indeed been gone for a while but it was never about defining when the shot started. It was only about whether the defender had LGP in time or not.

Not so sure about that anymore. The NCAA or at least JD Collins has addressed this situation. At least JD did with me at a camp (in a room full of people). They have shown some plays that clearly they wanted a shot to be completed. I know I call it the same way in both codes.

Peace

[ballgame99]

1. count it
2. I go with the push being before the hook.
3. Cant see, but looks like a good call.
4. Nothing
5. Great call! Love the kids hustle, but you have to get this foul.
6. Punch it! That's a charge and I don't see it as being a real difficult call. That defender was there all day and made a small lateral movement to maintain position.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Not so sure about that anymore. The NCAA or at least JD Collins has addressed this situation. At least JD did with me at a camp (in a room full of people). They have shown some plays that clearly they wanted a shot to be completed. I know I call it the same way in both codes.

Peace

Good! That would be an update that I've not heard yet.