Maui Invitational Video Plays (Michigan vs. LSU)

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

While the rule is essentially the same, the interpretations I've seen for NCAA suggest a more strict interpretation of what it takes to be in the shooting motion.

Upward motion has indeed been gone for a while but it was never about defining when the shot started. It was only about whether the defender had LGP in time or not.

Not so sure about that anymore. The NCAA or at least JD Collins has addressed this situation. At least JD did with me at a camp (in a room full of people). They have shown some plays that clearly they wanted a shot to be completed. I know I call it the same way in both codes.

Peace

[ballgame99]

1. count it
2. I go with the push being before the hook.
3. Cant see, but looks like a good call.
4. Nothing
5. Great call! Love the kids hustle, but you have to get this foul.
6. Punch it! That's a charge and I don't see it as being a real difficult call. That defender was there all day and made a small lateral movement to maintain position.

[Raymond]

#1) Shooting foul

#2) I'm more concerned that the Trail put a whistle on this. He has A1 in between him and B1. The play is going away from him when the contact occurs. He blows his whistle after another player steps in between him and the action.

The Lead has the best look at this as the play is coming towards him and he can see between A1 and B1.

#3) If I'm Lead, I'm not calling that unless something egregious happens. It's on the other side of the paint and up high near the rim. I'm trusting the Center on this one.

#4) Nothing. If free throw is missed and Blue gets the rebound, I might consider a foul on Blue for knocking White off his feet.

#5) Loose ball designation is correct. Prior, W5 commits a palming violation that's worth getting, IMO.

#6) I have a block. Defender is still sliding when A1 goes airborne.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Raymond

#6) I have a block. Defender is still sliding when A1 goes airborne.

Why does that matter?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Why does that matter?

Because he slid into the Airborne shooter

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Because he slid into the Airborne shooter

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

OK. Just wanted it to be clear...that sliding sideways after the shooter is airborne is not necessarily a problem but sliding INTO the airborne shooter or INTO the path of the airborne shooter is.

Play 1: Count it

Play 2: PC foul, Lead's play

Play 3: Clear foul

Play 4: Nothing

Play 5: Tough call but I'm ok with it. Looks like 50/50 scramble, not sure the Mich player takes out the LSU players feet enough. Ugly play, gotta clean that up IMO.

Play 6: Charge

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Not so sure about that anymore. The NCAA or at least JD Collins has addressed this situation. At least JD did with me at a camp (in a room full of people). They have shown some plays that clearly they wanted a shot to be completed. I know I call it the same way in both codes.

Peace

Good! That would be an update that I've not heard yet.