![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
As others have pointed out this contact should have been ignored as it took place during a dead ball. Your rules reference is 4-19-1 Note.
What you did was call a common foul during a dead ball, which is not permissible, unless the foul is committed by an airborne shooter. |
|
|||
Thanks for the input guys. I have never in 20 yrs had this happen. If I make a call like this its usually been a jump shooter who returns to the floor and the shot did not go in making it a reasonable call. That being said. I had no idea the ball went through until after I blew the whistle as I was watching both players land. I wouldn't say the contact was intentional or flagrant ... they just both landed fairly hard because of the contact... hence the whistle. I think in the future I will ignore the contact on this type of play unless as stated it was flagrant.
|
|
|||
NCAA-W rule change this year.
NCAA-W now allows for a foul in this dead ball period to be ruled a common foul.
Fouls - Personal Foul. (Rule 10-10.1). A personal foul is a player’s illegal contact with an opponent during a live ball, except for the dead-ball period immediately following a successful goal.
__________________
-- #thereferee99 |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airborne shooter | tref | Basketball | 10 | Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:30pm |
Non-airborne shooter? | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 7 | Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:40pm |
no airborne shooter | Junker | Basketball | 24 | Sun Jan 14, 2007 06:34pm |
Airborne Shooter? | johnnyrao | Basketball | 3 | Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:30am |
Airborne Passer vs Airborne Shooter | SDREGIIBB | Basketball | 8 | Mon Apr 11, 2005 04:33pm |