Iowa @ Maryland plays (Video)

[JRutledge]

Play #1:



Play #2:



Play 3:



Peace

[bucky]

1) Obvious travel and can't believe these refs (although only one may have been watching play) missed it and no one else appears to mind either!!

2) Although I might have treated it differently, nothing wrong with it.

3) Obvious indeed.

[just another ref]

That's not a backcourt violation.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by just another ref

That's not a backcourt violation.

It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by bucky

It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.

Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.

Good eye.

[Nevadaref]

1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.

Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.

I agree. I would have just had a foul against the White player

[bucky]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.

Since you are using a pronoun, "he", not sure to whom you are referring. Ball was in BC when #2 touched it.

[Rich]

It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by Rich

It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.

Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by frezer11

Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?

The ball either hits the division line or doesn't in your first scenario, which are you intending?

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

[bucky]

Originally Posted by Rich

It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.

Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by bucky

Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.

#2 and the ball both had frontcourt status when he touched it.