The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 25, 2017, 08:46pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Iowa @ Maryland plays (Video)

Play #1:



Play #2:



Play 3:



Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)

Last edited by JRutledge; Sat Feb 25, 2017 at 08:59pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 25, 2017, 09:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
1) Obvious travel and can't believe these refs (although only one may have been watching play) missed it and no one else appears to mind either!!

2) Although I might have treated it differently, nothing wrong with it.

3) Obvious indeed.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 25, 2017, 10:35pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
That's not a backcourt violation.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 25, 2017, 10:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
That's not a backcourt violation.
It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 12:20am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.

Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 01:32am
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.
Good eye.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 03:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 04:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.
Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 10:24am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.
I agree. I would have just had a foul against the White player
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 02:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.
Since you are using a pronoun, "he", not sure to whom you are referring. Ball was in BC when #2 touched it.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 03:04pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 03:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.
Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 03:34pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?
The ball either hits the division line or doesn't in your first scenario, which are you intending?

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 04:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.
Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2017, 04:14pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.


#2 and the ball both had frontcourt status when he touched it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charlotte @ Maryland plays (Video) JRutledge Basketball 15 Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:26am
Wisconsin @ Iowa Plays (Video) JRutledge Basketball 7 Thu Feb 25, 2016 02:08pm
video request Iowa/Wisconsin (Video) blindzebra Basketball 7 Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:58am
Maryland/Wake Forest (W)...Two plays JetMetFan Basketball 21 Mon Feb 11, 2013 06:12am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1