The Official Forum
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Iowa @ Maryland plays (Video) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/102323-iowa-maryland-plays-video.html)

JRutledge Sat Feb 25, 2017 08:46pm
Iowa @ Maryland plays (Video)
 
Play #1:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KB1OXxgMXY8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #2:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ng2cUyTa_3w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play 3:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xkMNiuk2-aw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

bucky Sat Feb 25, 2017 09:24pm
1) Obvious travel and can't believe these refs (although only one may have been watching play) missed it and no one else appears to mind either!!

2) Although I might have treated it differently, nothing wrong with it.

3) Obvious indeed.

just another ref Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:35pm
That's not a backcourt violation.

bucky Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 1001158)
That's not a backcourt violation.
It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.;)

just another ref Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:20am
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky (Post 1001159)
It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.;)

Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.

Sharpshooternes Sun Feb 26, 2017 01:32am
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 1001165)
Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.
Good eye.

Nevadaref Sun Feb 26, 2017 03:04am
1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.

Camron Rust Sun Feb 26, 2017 04:16am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 1001168)
1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.
Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.

Raymond Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:24am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 1001172)
Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.
I agree. I would have just had a foul against the White player

bucky Sun Feb 26, 2017 02:59pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 1001165)
Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.
Since you are using a pronoun, "he", not sure to whom you are referring. Ball was in BC when #2 touched it.

Rich Sun Feb 26, 2017 03:04pm
It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.

frezer11 Sun Feb 26, 2017 03:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 1001189)
It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.
Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?

Raymond Sun Feb 26, 2017 03:34pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 (Post 1001192)
Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?
The ball either hits the division line or doesn't in your first scenario, which are you intending?

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

bucky Sun Feb 26, 2017 04:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 1001189)
It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.
Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.

Rich Sun Feb 26, 2017 04:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky (Post 1001195)
Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.


#2 and the ball both had frontcourt status when he touched it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31pm.
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1