Syracuse @ GaTech - Illegal Screen in final seconds

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Yes it was in his field of vision, all he had to do was turn his head. Regardless of this fact, he was given a step and took it and then the contact took place with a stationary screener.



Yes. He did not exaggerate his stance or set up in an unusual way.



Agreed and if he did not give the proper time and distance, this would be a foul. This in my opinion was not a foul. And even if it was borderline I still would not want a foul called here.

Peace

I agree with everything you have said with regard to Time And Distance. I think that the people who are saying this is a foul is that the Screener set his feet wider than his shoulders and the Screenee made contact with the Screener's lower leg.

MTD, Sr.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I agree with everything you have said with regard to Time And Distance. I think that the people who are saying this is a foul is that the Screener set his feet wider than his shoulders and the Screenee made contact with the Screener's lower leg.



MTD, Sr.

That's what I'm saying.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I agree with everything you have said with regard to Time And Distance. I think that the people who are saying this is a foul is that the Screener set his feet wider than his shoulders and the Screenee made contact with the Screener's lower leg.

MTD, Sr.

I disagree with that even more if that is the case. I do not see him sticking out his leg. He moves to get into place IMO. And the contact looks more with his torso than with the leg.

Peace

[Rich]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I disagree with that even more if that is the case. I do not see him sticking out his leg. He moves to get into place IMO. And the contact looks more with his torso than with the leg.

Peace

We'll put you down for one vote - NO, then.

I think we've all said what we think here. Some of us agree, some disagree.

For me, he sets the right leg well wider than shoulder width (freeze it at :14) and the defender goes right over it.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Rich

We'll put you down for one vote - NO, then.

I think we've all said what we think here. Some of us agree, some disagree.

For me, he sets the right leg well wider than shoulder width (freeze it at :14) and the defender goes right over it.

OK, I still do not see it that way. There is a reason we call it "judgment."

Peace

[Rich]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

OK, I still do not see it that way. There is a reason we call it "judgment."



Peace

The one who was standing there with the whistle agreed with me, however.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Rich

The one who was standing there with the whistle agreed with me, however.

Well if that is the standard then we will be right or wrong many times. I do not care what he called, because many times it is seen as a IC later. I would rather see if the league or the NCAA says so. If they put this on the tape then I can feel more confident on who agrees with who.

Peace

[Rich]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Well if that is the standard then we will be right or wrong many times. I do not care what he called, because many times it is seen as a IC later. I would rather see if the league or the NCAA says so. If they put this on the tape then I can feel more confident on who agrees with who.



Peace

I did put a little smiley face there.

Typically when people go over a knee or hip it raises a red flag for me....