Ejected From Tournament (Video)

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Moosie74

I never once said anything about a concussion. I said she should be checked. Coach is welcome to disagree and put her back in by T/O or re-entry rules.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Not here. If she's sent off to be checked for a concussion, she's not returning without the approval of an appropriate health care professional.

I think putting the onus on officials is insane. Here we only send them off if they're exhibiting signs / symptoms -- then the health care professional makes the call. As they should.

[Moosie74]

Originally Posted by Rich

Not here. If she's sent off to be checked for a concussion, she's not returning without the approval of an appropriate health care professional.

Concussions I agree.

But running full force could cause other injuries. If you simply say Bob, #10 was the cause of my stopping play, you've said nothing about concussions, a broken finger or anything else.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Rich

Not here. If she's sent off to be checked for a concussion, she's not returning without the approval of an appropriate health care professional.

I think putting the onus on officials is insane. Here we only send them off if they're exhibiting signs / symptoms -- then the health care professional makes the call. As they should.

NY State they are done for the day and need a doctor's note clearing them for when they want to return to play.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by deecee

NY State they are done for the day and need a doctor's note clearing them for when they want to return to play.

Here we send them out if they are exhibiting signs or symptoms of a concussion, in our opinion.

But whether they can return that day depends on the physician or LAT who examines the player. If that person decides the athlete does not have a concussion and is not exhibiting signs/symptoms and is fit to play, that's all that's required.

If there is no physician or LAT available, the player is done for the day.

If a concussion is diagnosed, the player is done for the day. If a player is exhibiting signs / symptoms to the doctor or LAT, the player is done for the day.

I'm not a doctor or LAT and I'm not the one who should be deciding these things. Even so, I can have a player removed if I'm not satisfied that the player is OK.

---------
WIAA (WI) Policy:

If you suspect a player may have a concussion, that athlete should be immediately removed from play. The injured athlete should be kept out of play until they are cleared to return by an appropriate health care provider. If the appropriate health care provider determines the athlete is not exhibiting the signs/symptoms of a concussion and does not have a concussion, they may return to play.

A physician or LAT may evaluate an athlete for concussion. If they determine that the athlete is not displaying the signs of a concussion or does not have a concussion, the athlete may return to play. If they determine that the athlete is displaying the signs of a concussion or does in fact have a concussion, the athlete may not return to play (with or without a note) that day.

WIAA Sports Medical Advisory Council identifies a physician and licensed athletic trainer (LAT) under the direct supervision of a physician as an appropriate health care professional for determining return to play other than the same day.

[Welpe]

This type of foul can't be considered in a vacuum. Context, game temperature and the result all should factor into what needs to be called here.

I've called a nearly identical play a flagrant foul also. The game situation was the same as this one and the player had been a problem already that game. That made flagrant the right call.