9-9....?

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by deecee

There is nothing more technical than by rule this is a BC violation. In reality it won't and shouldn't get called.

Why shouldn't it get called if it's witnessed by an official who knows the rules and knows it's a violation?

[deecee]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Why shouldn't it get called if it's witnessed by an official who knows the rules and knows it's a violation?

So you call a 3 second violation as soon as you hit a 3 count?

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by deecee

So you call a 3 second violation as soon as you hit a 3 count?

I'll refer you to what Camron said because he said it better than I could have.

[SD Referee]

Originally Posted by SC Official

I'll refer you to what Camron said because he said it better than I could have.

Are you incapable of speaking for yourself? You like to put words in other peoples' mouths. Please let us know your stance on calling 3 seconds as soon as you hit 3.

[SD Referee]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Why shouldn't it get called if it's witnessed by an official who knows the rules and knows it's a violation?

Because, in my opinion, it's a ticky tack thing to call one second into the game. It has little to no impact on the game other than an official trying to show how smart he is.

I doubt any coach would know it was a violation and I doubt anybody in the crowd would either. Do we really want to blow the whistle one second into the game for this? I don't.

[Rob1968]

So, if we call the backcourt violation, in question, which team gets the possession arrow?

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Rob1968

So, if we call the backcourt violation, in question, which team gets the possession arrow?

Since a BC violation is always preceded by team control, the arrow is properly set toward black's basket the instant white gains control.