The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 18, 2016, 12:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 52
Further confusion by the NFHS

The Rules by Topic book on page 103 removed legally from the verbiage, but kept the Rationale that told us why the word legally was added to the definition!
It seems clear that by referencing 6-4-5 in the case book play, that the NFHS considers the last sentence of 6-4-5 to be controlling. I know that reference was not there in the 2014-15 case book play, but I don't have the 2015-16 case book play to see if it was added this year or last.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Revised Brain Teaser MD Longhorn Football 15 Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:42pm
Revised: First, Osborne; Second, Christensen Carl Childress Baseball 14 Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:42am
NFHS OBS Revised Rule whiskers_ump Softball 4 Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:26pm
revised question on penalty during touchdown timharris Football 8 Fri Aug 13, 2004 09:59am
Revised 2nd situation, check swing 4th out. BJ Moose Baseball 13 Fri Jan 19, 2001 11:27am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1