|
|||
Quote:
2. The ball was being held next to his left shoulder when the defender whacked the right arm down at the elbow in nothing other than an effort to make certain that the offensive player couldn't shoot and score. The defender was nowhere near the ball. 3. The three D1 guys using a monitor concluded that it was an FF1. 4. The "hard foul" mentality is what the current instructors and rules writers are striving to change and rid from the game. Last edited by Nevadaref; Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 05:33pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
Without seeing the play we don't know if that camp play would be a flagrant-1 or not. Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
1) why is this a travel?
2) no comments needed 3) I have a normal foul. I call my share of intentionals and FF1's, but this would not be one of them. Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Mon Mar 14, 2016 at 07:54am. |
|
|||
Quote:
John Adams for example used to be a D3, NAIA and D1 supervisor before he got to be the NCAA Coordinator. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I think most have him gathering with the left foot on the floor about in the middle of the FT circle. Then a step with the right and a step with the left.
|
|
|||
After watching a few more times, I still don't see control until after the left foot is off the ground. I don't see it as that conclusive, but it is interesting to watch these plays over and over. There's such a fine line sometimes. I think this is not a travel.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
1 - Travel (but subject to live speed interp of when he "gathered")
2 - Travel 3 - I'm also not a huge fan of this one, but based on current applications of the rule they got it right. Re #3: I think the biggest issue people have with this is that there is still division, not sure if its regional or age or just individual difference in regards to the flagrant/intentional mentality. I grew up watching ball in the 80's and 90's too, with my coaches telling me that if you are going to foul make sure they don't get the shot off. Currently reality is that "hard fouls" or fouls just to break up plays are being asked to be called as unsportsmanlikes/flagrants/intentionals depending on your rule set. Lots of officials I work with and talk to seem to feel that these (Somewhat like techs for some) only come in extreme situations and that somehow calling them is a relflection of the game getting out of control as opposed to part of game management. We are routinely be asked to make these calls more and more "automatic" in situations that we see to simply eliminate certain types of plays from the game. Our history in the games or personal feelings about the game might not match what we are trying to eliminate but thats the game.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
|||
I think it's important to, at first, stick with a normal foul. Then take a moment to review the play in your head, and possibly see what your partners think, before upgrading the call to an intentional/flagrant.
Especially for officials, like me, that can let their emotions get the better of them. If you do that, then it'll be very hard to be second guessed. Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk |
|
|||
Quote:
My advice: If an action fits the POE or definition/instruction have the courage to make the proper call. (Especially in contests without a monitor) |
|
|||
Quote:
This season my partner called a flagrant foul and ejected a player. We talked about the call after the game and it turned out his call was excessive and a regular tech would have sufficed. But too late. That player was gone for part of the second quarter and the remainder of the game. And that's the problem. By the way, courage has nothing to do with it. It's about being fair. So good for you if your initial reaction is correct 100% of the time, but some of us do make errors. An error on a violation stinks, but at least the kid can still play. Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAAC Title Game: Several Plays (Video) | JRutledge | Basketball | 52 | Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:32pm |
Video title speaks for itself, you make the call. Ejected? | RKBUmp | Softball | 52 | Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:41am |
Buzzer Beater In MN Section Title Game Friday night (Video) | paulsonj72 | Basketball | 18 | Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:08am |
Video Request: Boise State v New Mexico Mountain West Tournament | SCalScoreKeeper | Basketball | 0 | Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:33am |
Video request: OVC Title game Murray St. vs. Belmont (Video Added) | JRutledge | Basketball | 8 | Sat Mar 23, 2013 06:18pm |