Couple of scenarios

[Raymond]

We need a better description of the play, to include the status of the ball and the timing of the 2 fouls.

[so cal lurker]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

We need a better description of the play, to include the status of the ball and the timing of the 2 fouls.

I posted what was described to me about a call that irritates people a year later. In the actual game, apparently, the T "won" -- the basket was cancelled and only the PF was charged.

anyone care to answer (2) from the OP re NFHS rules? (In a game last night, it was POI with the shot clock was reset -- I thought the shot clock should not reset. Though as I write this, I remember that pure NFHS doesn't have a shot clock -- this was in California, which does.)

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by so cal lurker

I posted what was described to me about a call that irritates people a year later. In the actual game, apparently, the T "won" -- the basket was cancelled and only the PF was charged.

anyone care to answer (2) from the OP re NFHS rules? (In a game last night, it was POI with the shot clock was reset -- I thought the shot clock should not reset. Though as I write this, I remember that pure NFHS doesn't have a shot clock -- this was in California, which does.)

There are no NFHS rules for the shot clock, states with the shot clock each have there own rules. What one state does may be different than another state.

In NCAA the shot clock does not reset.

[Camron Rust]

If I have read the play right, this is NOT the traditional blarge. A blarge is one point of contact judged differently by two officials. This one iis two different actions observed by two officials while the ball remains live. If the time span is close enough, it could be considered a double foul. That would mean the shot would count and the defense would get the ball. If they were noticeably separated, I'd treat them as two fouls....a false double foul. Order of occurance... No basket (PC). Shooter gets to shots. Defense gets the ball.