|
|||
Team A is in control of the ball in the BC, B2 knocks the ball away and you are terminating your BC count?
Also, let's not forget that the partner did know the BC exception in relation to this play: "In our post-game discussion, he says there's an exception in the BC rule for a steal." The defensive player did not steal a pass while airborne. The partner did not say that B2 never gained PC in her back court.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Fri Jan 29, 2016 at 10:17am. |
|
|||
That's not the description bainsey gave. He said B2 stole the ball in A's back court, he didn't say she knocked it away.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
No, otherwise it wouldn't have been a violation. The OP said they gained control in A's backcourt (B's frontcourt) and then went into A's frontcourt (B's backcourt). So the count wouldn't terminate until B gained possession, still in A's backcourt.
|
|
|||
He called backcourt violation because Team B gained possession in its FC and then dribbled into B backcourt. Bainsey would have been counting 10 on team A originally. If B gains control of ball then the count on A stops. If B just knocks ball around then count on A continues until ball hits A FC.
He called violation so he had to have determined that B controlled ball in FC and dribbled or fumbled it into BC and was first touch. |
|
|||
B2 "took" the ball into B's BC. That terminates the count whether B2 has PC (as part of the "taking") or not.
|
|
|||
B2 first touched the ball 3-5 feet from the division line. bainsey is responsible for the count. Until the ball moves to Team A's FC he has to judge whether or not B2 is in possession at any point before she crosses the division line. He so judged. The same way it could be judged Buddy Hield had PC in his front court in that play from the Oklahoma game (absent other aspects of that particular play).
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Fri Jan 29, 2016 at 11:08am. |
|
|||
Quote:
At some point it switches to new T. In between, it might be some joint coverage. As I envision the play (recognizing that I might be envisioning it wrong, after re-reading the entire thread; and recognizing that others might be envisioning it differently), I don't see it as being the new T's (full) responsibility, yet. I think that this is one of those calls where either official can get it (assuming they both know the rules, of course, which was an issue in the OP). And, if one of them judges control and the other doesn't, ... |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VIDEO REQUEST - Kicking Violation and 10 Second Violation - OU/WV -- January 16, 2016 | WhistlesAndStripes | Basketball | 1 | Sat Jan 16, 2016 06:36pm |
Free Violation and Lane Violation Situation | habram | Basketball | 3 | Tue Dec 10, 2013 06:23pm |
Backcourt violation - 3 second violation | Shades of Gray | Basketball | 15 | Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:38pm |
Throw-in violation or OOB violation? | Nevadaref | Basketball | 47 | Fri Nov 02, 2007 07:15pm |
Clever? or a violation ,trying 2 avoid a violation | hardwdref | Basketball | 3 | Sat Nov 13, 2004 04:17pm |