The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
Looking at all the replays - which is basically what the crew saw - I can understand why they went CDBT, which is essentially an F1 technical. Missouri #22 didn't wind up to hit Arkansas #33 and there wasn't a heck of a lot of follow through. In other words, it may not be as severe/extreme as it appeared on first glance.
This is just attempting to rationalize the decision rendered. It is still wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
She hit her in the face, intentionally. With or without windup or follow through, I'm hard pressed to see this as anything other than a fight.
This is absolutely correct. This was a deliberate cheap shot.
The best ruling would have been a held ball followed by a technical foul which carries an ejection. Whatever that is called in NCAAW terminology.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Flagrant Sharpshooternes Basketball 6 Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:18am
flagrant foul/flagrant technical splitveer Basketball 6 Tue Feb 16, 2010 01:05pm
Flagrant T or not? Berkut Basketball 40 Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:10pm
Flagrant? rainmaker Basketball 5 Tue Dec 10, 2002 06:55pm
Flagrant mlancast Basketball 8 Tue Feb 05, 2002 06:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1