The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 106
NIU vs. W. Mich scuffle

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=14584641&sf19004741=1

Well..... this was 5 minutes into the game.
End result was double flagrant on NIU #5, ejected.
NIU #0, #12, #32 ejected for leaving bench.
NIU #34 issued a technical, and WMU #42 issued a technical.

Watched it a lot...
The trail signals a defensive tip here on the steal but I'm pretty positive red #23 controls the ball in the front court after the tip and goes into the backcourt.
Obviously a "bang-bang" situation and there's a lot going on, but a case where Center needs to step up and help. Easy to say from watching the video and not actually reffing the game, but a close call here could have avoided a scrum and 4 ejections. (But I'm not excusing the hard foul, nor the players leaving their bench)

Discuss.....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Last edited by tnolan; Sun Jan 17, 2016 at 09:39am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Why is the Lead moving away from the endline while calling this foul? It is also comical how he is standing there signaling while all hell is breaking loose behind him! The C actually responds to the melee first.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:03am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
The call or no call at the division line had absolutely nothing to do with the hard foul and the subsequent scuffle.

I'm not sure what the lead is doing, though. The C saved his bacon.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Why is the Lead moving away from the endline while calling this foul? It is also comical how he is standing there signaling while all hell is breaking loose behind him! The C actually responds to the melee first.
lol. was thinking the same!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
The call or no call at the division line had absolutely nothing to do with the hard foul and the subsequent scuffle.

I'm not sure what the lead is doing, though. The C saved his bacon.
but do you think a backcourt violation shoulda been called?
if you get the 1st, you avoid the 2nd. doesn't excuse the actions tho.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:35am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnolan View Post
lol. was thinking the same!



but do you think a backcourt violation shoulda been called?
if you get the 1st, you avoid the 2nd. doesn't excuse the actions tho.
Only because one followed the other. Not because of the magic of preventive officiating.

Haven't really watched the first half of the play that closely. If there's doubt, they're going to let it play out -- after all, the ball went the other way.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Only because one followed the other. Not because of the magic of preventive officiating.

Haven't really watched the first half that closely. If there's doubt, they're going to let it play out -- after all, the ball went the other way.
yeah, i'm not saying they call the violation to prevent it. i'm saying they call the violation because it's a violation.
BUT, i agree...it's super close and did end up going for white. honestly, i miss this call too.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:38pm
The Whistle of Justice
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 16
Travel before the dunk attempt... not that that would have saved the hard foul from behind... haha! Agree that we could have had an over and back prior to the mugging. Rough way to start the 1st 5min. I wonder what the Monmouth bench would have been choreographing at this point?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
"Double flagrant" on NIU #5?

There is no such thing as a "double flagrant" on a single player.

And I echo what others have said, what the heck is the L doing?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
"Double flagrant" on NIU #5?

There is no such thing as a "double flagrant" on a single player.

And I echo what others have said, what the heck is the L doing?
It is an NCAA game. He means that an FF2 was assessed.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
It is an NCAA game. He means that an FF2 was assessed.
What does it being an NCAA game have to do with it? A "double flagrant" is not what caused the player to be ejected. That was my point.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:18pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
YouTube version



Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
What does it being an NCAA game have to do with it? A "double flagrant" is not what caused the player to be ejected. That was my point.
Perhaps the poster was attempting to differentiate between FF1 and FF2, but didn't know the proper terminology.

On the other hand it is possible that the player was charged with both a personal flagrant foul 2 for the contact foul during play and then also with a flagrant technical for something during the skirmish that followed. So it is possible that he received two flagrant fouls. I still wouldn't use the word "double" as that means fouls by opponents, but again he probably doesn't know the proper diction.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:19am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
McJunkins is a pretty good ref, probably not much he could have done anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
McJunkins is a pretty good ref, probably not much he could have done anyway.
He certainly could have closed in fast and stepped between the players.

When a foul of that ferocity happens anyone with half a brain should anticipate something further taking place. He completely failed to recognize that.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
"Double flagrant" on NIU #5?

There is no such thing as a "double flagrant" on a single player.

And I echo what others have said, what the heck is the L doing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
It is an NCAA game. He means that an FF2 was assessed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
What does it being an NCAA game have to do with it? A "double flagrant" is not what caused the player to be ejected. That was my point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Perhaps the poster was attempting to differentiate between FF1 and FF2, but didn't know the proper terminology.

On the other hand it is possible that the player was charged with both a personal flagrant foul 2 for the contact foul during play and then also with a flagrant technical for something during the skirmish that followed. So it is possible that he received two flagrant fouls. I still wouldn't use the word "double" as that means fouls by opponents, but again he probably doesn't know the proper diction.
yeah, not sure what actually was called....
wasn't thinking before i posted, but that's how it was written in the official book. doesn't make it right, but just saying...that's where i got the foul count from.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mich Mich St block/charge call, then makeup call (Video) pfan1981 Basketball 23 Wed Mar 05, 2014 04:48pm
Video request: Michigan/Duke-OOB, scuffle, technical, resumption of play (Clip Added) fiasco Basketball 18 Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:23am
Mich vs Mich st yooperbballref Basketball 22 Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:57am
Mich St/ Mich STEVED21 Football 36 Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:28pm
Mich / Mich St 12 breaking the huddle gtwbam Football 4 Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:17pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1