The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 12:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 536
Which is why I probably whack him for unsporting conduct, rather than a DOG warning.

ETA: This is in response to Dad's last post.

Last edited by UNIgiantslayers; Wed Jan 06, 2016 at 12:45pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 12:56pm
Dad Dad is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNIgiantslayers View Post
Which is why I probably whack him for unsporting conduct, rather than a DOG warning.

ETA: This is in response to Dad's last post.
IMO, this is a bit of a stretch on the wording: not limited to.

This play is covered in 10-1-5e.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
IMO, this is a bit of a stretch on the wording: not limited to.

This play is covered in 10-1-5e.
Agreed, but it feels like I'm rewarding with a D.O.G. It's a smart move by the kid that forces the official to make a tough decision, and IMO it's an act that is unsporting. As another poster said, to each their own.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:20pm
Dad Dad is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNIgiantslayers View Post
Agreed, but it feels like I'm rewarding with a D.O.G. It's a smart move by the kid that forces the official to make a tough decision, and IMO it's an act that is unsporting. As another poster said, to each their own.
Players use the rules to gain an advantage all the time, especially in stopping the clock. From the sounds of it a few want to give the defense a T for intelligent play. Why not T the offensive for unsporting when they throw the ball high into the air to run the clock out?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
Players use the rules to gain an advantage all the time, especially in stopping the clock. From the sounds of it a few want to give the defense a T for intelligent play. Why not T the offensive for unsporting when they throw the ball high into the air to run the clock out?
Now we are comparing apples and oranges..haha

It is a simple question and we are having a hard time finding a clear line.

If I use a DOG in a tight game with seconds left does the book clearly want a DOG to help the defense or with our judgement could it be something more. Honestly I wish we had more insight as I bet this happens more then we realize or hear about.
__________________
BigT "The rookie"
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:28pm
Dad Dad is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
Now we are comparing apples and oranges..haha

It is a simple question and we are having a hard time finding a clear line.

If I use a DOG in a tight game with seconds left does the book clearly want a DOG to help the defense or with our judgement could it be something more. Honestly I wish we had more insight as I bet this happens more then we realize or hear about.
Players intentionally touch the ball after a made basket all the time and we call a delay. There is nothing in the rule book to change this rule until the final five seconds of the game.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PG County, MD
Posts: 412
Actually, an official does have a rules basis to go directly to a T in this situation, if warranted. It's covered under rule 10-3-5.

ART. 5

A player shall not:

Delay the game by acts such as:

a. Preventing the ball from being made live promptly or from being put in play.
__________________
You learn something new everyday ...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vermont
Posts: 96
Case play

see case play - 9.2.10 sit A comment.


In situations with the clock running and five or less seconds left in the game, a throw-in plane violation or interfering with the ball following a goal should be ignored if its only purpose is to stop the clock. However, if the tactic in any way interferes with the thrower’s efforts to make a throw-in, a technical foul for delay shall be called even though no previous warning had been issued. In this situation, if the official stopped the clock and issued a team warning, it would allow the team to benefit from the tactic.

Last edited by gslefeb; Wed Jan 06, 2016 at 01:28pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by gslefeb View Post
see case play - 9.2.10 sit A comment.


In situations with the clock running and five or less seconds left in the game, a throw-in plane violation or interfering with the ball following a goal should be ignored if its only purpose is to stop the clock. However, if the tactic in any way interferes with the thrower’s efforts to make a throw-in, a technical foul for delay shall be called even though no previous warning had been issued. In this situation, if the official stopped the clock and issued a team warning, it would allow the team to benefit from the tactic.
I like this one too. And another reason I think leaning toward the T is the right call. Though if I were watching Dad and he called a DOG I wouldnt have an issue either. Again sometimes there are just judgements we have to make.
__________________
BigT "The rookie"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by PG_Ref View Post
Actually, an official does have a rules basis to go directly to a T in this situation, if warranted. It's covered under rule 10-3-5.

ART. 5

A player shall not:

Delay the game by acts such as:

a. Preventing the ball from being made live promptly or from being put in play.
Wow PG_Ref great find and in my opinion with all the details of what happened in that game that is what I am using on that kid.
__________________
BigT "The rookie"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
IMO, this is a bit of a stretch on the wording: not limited to.

This play is covered in 10-1-5e.
I disagree that this covers it. The play and rule are for your typical lets play jungle ball and slow down the inbounds cuz I am tired. This kid clearly wanted to give his team a chance to set up defense and stop the clock. We have rules that discuss trying to stop the clock with a foul to win a game. This is more complicated. Though the book isnt giving us a clear leg to stand on it does seem to me to be more complicated then a DOG which helps the defense. Though calling the DOG gives the winning coach a chance to call a TO if he has been smart enough to save one.
__________________
BigT "The rookie"
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 06, 2016, 01:26pm
Dad Dad is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
I disagree that this covers it. The play and rule are for your typical lets play jungle ball and slow down the inbounds cuz I am tired. This kid clearly wanted to give his team a chance to set up defense and stop the clock. We have rules that discuss trying to stop the clock with a foul to win a game. This is more complicated. Though the book isnt giving us a clear leg to stand on it does seem to me to be more complicated then a DOG which helps the defense. Though calling the DOG gives the winning coach a chance to call a TO if he has been smart enough to save one.
The OP later said there were no TOs left. I could easily imagine the coach telling his players to go for a violation to stop the clock.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
End of Half Delay of Game Question theboys Football 16 Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:05pm
delay of game question bballrefinks Basketball 6 Tue Nov 09, 2010 04:15pm
Delay of Game question eagle_12 Football 2 Sat Sep 12, 2009 07:49pm
Twenty technicals in one game - all for delay of game! Mark Padgett Basketball 14 Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:55pm
Question Regarding Delay Of Game Warnings walter Basketball 10 Mon Dec 11, 2000 12:16am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1