![]() |
|
|
|||
I think they meant FT line extended.
|
|
|||
Well even so, think about the route taken to get to the 3rd spot. Either he's pointlessly walking down the sideline and going to take a 90 degree turn once he gets inside the FT line extended, or he's so far inside the 3 point line that there is no way anyone should've administered the ball in the first place. Just odd.
|
|
|||
Interesting discussion. No doubt many of us would blow the play dead and allow the player in with no penalty if we thought we were at fault for not seeing
him. But technically I don't see any provision in the rules for doing so, and that's what I think of the test as being, all about technicalities. And what about all the variables here which are unknown? B3 may have been standing in this same spot behind the free throw shooter all night, but decided at the last split second for whatever reason to step in on this one. I think technically this is false, but in real life it is very often true, and should be. Moreover, I will file it away under BAD QUESTIONS WHICH SHOULD NEVER, EVER APPEAR ON A TEST. Thanks for the opinions.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CCA Test Answers | commteacher | Football | 1 | Thu Jul 13, 2006 06:20pm |
test answers | Ohioref3 | Football | 2 | Mon Oct 03, 2005 02:31am |
Test 2 Answers | Gatorbbref | Basketball | 13 | Fri Dec 31, 2004 02:20am |
Test answers | dr_donald_t | Basketball | 134 | Wed Nov 17, 2004 07:22am |
Test Answers? | Snake~eyes | Football | 13 | Sun Nov 02, 2003 01:35am |