|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
back court violation following an interrupted dribble?
A1 dribbling in the back court loses control of the ball. The ball bounces/rolls into the front court. A1 dives and recovers the loose ball but has a foot still touching the back court. Nothing or b/c violation?
|
|
|||
Violation. During an interrupted dribble the three points rule does not apply, if that's what you're asking.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
No. I'm having a brain cramp regarding 9-9-2 which I think is the applicable rule (While in player and team control in its back court, a player shall not cause the ball to go from back court>front court>back court . . .) However, during the interrupted dribble there is no player control. Even so, the ball went from back court>front court>back court all while there was team control. Maybe I'm distracted by the Browns game.
|
|
|||
The ball has established front court status. Then, while touching the ball, the player location is in the backcourt (Rule 4.35.2) "...a player is touching the backcourt...the player is located in backcourt..." Violation-backcourt.
__________________
Tomorrow is promised to no one. Stay thirsty my friend! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Reminder ...
The four elements for having a backcourt violation are: there must be team control (and initial player control
when coming from a throw-in); the ball must have achieved frontcourt status; the team in team control must be the last to touch the ball before it goes into the backcourt; that same team must be the first to touch after the ball has been in the backcourt.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Interesting point. Are you saying that the dribble, although interupted, has not ended so both feet and the ball would need to be in the frontcourt to gain frontcourt status?
|
|
|||
Quote:
Does that help? Let me add: OP did not state "recovered loose ball while standing with foot/feet in backcourt". Presumed "dive" meant contacting floor with body other than feet.
__________________
Tomorrow is promised to no one. Stay thirsty my friend! Last edited by Gutierrez7; Tue Dec 01, 2015 at 09:30am. Reason: Clarification |
|
|||
I would say the dribble has not ended (therefore by rule the term "interrupted dribble"). If A1 were to get to the ball and continue the dribble, the interrupted dribble ends and the original dribble continues. But in the OP A1 dives on the floor and possesses the ball ending both the interrupted dribble and the original dribble. During the interrupted dribble I would think A1 is no longer a dribbler because certain rules no longer apply to the situation or to A1 that would apply if A1 was a dribbler. (See 4-15-6) And, as j.a.r. said, the 3 pts. issue would not apply either if A1 was not a dribbler. So, as I see it, we have a situation (interrupted dribble, no player control) but while in Team A control, the ball goes from the back court to the front court and then is touched by A1 whose location is in the back court which results in a violation. What has been confusing to me is the wording in Rule 9-9-2: "While in player and team control in the back court a player shall not cause the ball to go from the back court to the front court and return to the back court . . . Which seems to imply there must be both player and team control which is not the case in an interrupted dribble. To me, it would be more accurate if the wording said: "While in player or team control in the back court . . .
Last edited by billyu2; Tue Dec 01, 2015 at 10:22pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
I believe that, while the dribble hasn't ended but is interrupted, the dribbler still has the protection of the 3 points rule. (And I've changed my mind twice as I've typed this).
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Tue Dec 01, 2015 at 03:30pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by OKREF; Tue Dec 01, 2015 at 04:26pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
The definition of Dribble says "A dribble is ball movement CAUSED BY A PLAYER IN CONTROL...." Even though it is called an "interrupted dribble", it is not, by definition, a DRIBBLE since there is no player control. The player has the right to resume the dribble (get player control back) but what is in between cant be a dribble under the definitions imo. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
a. no closely guarded count b. no player control fouls c. no time out requests granted d. no out of bounds violations for the player involved |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Back Court Violation | Ed Maeder | Basketball | 20 | Tue Feb 26, 2013 09:01pm |
Back Court Violation ? | trsandy | Basketball | 23 | Wed Feb 10, 2010 01:34pm |
Back Court Violation | Ricejock | Basketball | 16 | Sun Jan 30, 2005 06:12am |
Back Court Violation????? | Buckeye Ref | Basketball | 20 | Fri Jan 28, 2005 05:16pm |
Back court violation?? | mwalker13004 | Basketball | 11 | Tue Jan 06, 2004 03:22pm |