Flagrant or not??? (NCAAM Rule)

deecee · #1 (**permalink**) Tue Nov 17, 2015, 02:27pm

The second T could be flagrant but it doesn't HAVE to be. If the justification is that since the coach *MAY* be ejected is ludicrous. The coach can have up to 3 T's before ejection. Unless I'm missing something the answer is depends of if he/she earned one (like calling me a, "@#$@#$ piece of @#$@#$ @#$@#$").

JRutledge · #2 (**permalink**) Tue Nov 17, 2015, 02:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee

The second T could be flagrant but it doesn't HAVE to be. If the justification is that since the coach *MAY* be ejected is ludicrous. The coach can have up to 3 T's before ejection. Unless I'm missing something the answer is depends of if he/she earned one (like calling me a, "@#$@#$ piece of @#$@#$ @#$@#$").

I am only talking about a T that would not result on its own as a flagrant 2 act but that it happens to be his second T of the game.

Peace

deecee · #3 (**permalink**) Tue Nov 17, 2015, 02:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I am only talking about a T that would not result on its own as a flagrant 2 act but that it happens to be his second T of the game.

Peace

The answer is no.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Official NCAAM and NCAAW Proposed Rule Changes for 2013-14 Season	JetMetFan	Basketball	55	Mon Aug 12, 2013 01:42pm
Possible rule changes, NCAAM style...	JetMetFan	Basketball	10	Wed May 08, 2013 06:06pm
NCAAM Flagrant 2	stiffler3492	Basketball	29	Sat Jan 19, 2013 05:44pm
NCAAM mechanics	fullor30	Basketball	8	Mon Nov 29, 2010 04:33pm
flagrant foul/flagrant technical	splitveer	Basketball	6	Tue Feb 16, 2010 01:05pm