The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 17, 2013, 08:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
NCAA and NFHS question

I had the following situation presented in another forum. NCAA or NFHS rules.

Bases loaded, 1 out, bottom of the 7th in a 3-0 game. Right handed batter smokes one down the right field line, and in the process of letting his bat go, it lands entirely into fair territory. R3 and R2 score easily and R1 is hustling to try and score. A relay comes in and the throw coming into the plate hits the bat and bounds out of play. BR is standing on 3rd as ball goes out of play. Tricky situation go ahead and make the call, and place all runners!


The poster insists that NCAA and NFHS rules will result in an interference call on the batter for throwing a bat into the field of play that interferes with a fielder trying to make a play. This would result in Batter out and runners returning.

By OBR and MLBUM this is nonsense.

???

Rita
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 17, 2013, 08:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rita C View Post
I had the following situation presented in another forum. NCAA or NFHS rules.

Bases loaded, 1 out, bottom of the 7th in a 3-0 game. Right handed batter smokes one down the right field line, and in the process of letting his bat go, it lands entirely into fair territory. R3 and R2 score easily and R1 is hustling to try and score. A relay comes in and the throw coming into the plate hits the bat and bounds out of play. BR is standing on 3rd as ball goes out of play. Tricky situation go ahead and make the call, and place all runners!


The poster insists that NCAA and NFHS rules will result in an interference call on the batter for throwing a bat into the field of play that interferes with a fielder trying to make a play. This would result in Batter out and runners returning.

By OBR and MLBUM this is nonsense.

???

Rita
By all of them, this is nonsense. Have him find a cite for interference.

All runners get two bases from the time of the throw.
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 17, 2013, 09:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
By all of them, this is nonsense. Have him find a cite for interference.

All runners get two bases from the time of the throw.
He's citing NFHS 7-3-6 and NCAA 7-11

Rita
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 17, 2013, 10:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
7-3-6 "If the bat breaks and is hit by the ball or hits a runner or a fielder,
no interference shall be called. If a whole bat is thrown and interferes with a
defensive player attempting a play, interference will be called.

PENALTY: The batter is out and runners return. If, in the umpire's judgment,
interference prevented a possible double play, two players may be ruled out."

Had the batter thrown the bat out in Right field and it interfered with the fielder making the play then I would agree. After the fact then all we have is a bat on the field that was hit by a bad throw. I think he is stretching his interpretation.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 18, 2013, 08:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
7-3-6 "If the bat breaks and is hit by the ball or hits a runner or a fielder,
no interference shall be called. If a whole bat is thrown and interferes with a
defensive player attempting a play, interference will be called.

PENALTY: The batter is out and runners return. If, in the umpire's judgment,
interference prevented a possible double play, two players may be ruled out."

Had the batter thrown the bat out in Right field and it interfered with the fielder making the play then I would agree. After the fact then all we have is a bat on the field that was hit by a bad throw. I think he is stretching his interpretation.
That same ruling and wording is in all the codes and in all of them the play presented is "award BR (and R1 if needed) home".

What other forum?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 18, 2013, 09:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 122
The bat is not interfering with a defensive player. So no interference, 2 bases from time of throw.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rita C View Post
I had the following situation presented in another forum. NCAA or NFHS rules.

Bases loaded, 1 out, bottom of the 7th in a 3-0 game. Right handed batter smokes one down the right field line, and in the process of letting his bat go, it lands entirely into fair territory. R3 and R2 score easily and R1 is hustling to try and score. A relay comes in and the throw coming into the plate hits the bat and bounds out of play. BR is standing on 3rd as ball goes out of play. Tricky situation go ahead and make the call, and place all runners!


The poster insists that NCAA and NFHS rules will result in an interference call on the batter for throwing a bat into the field of play that interferes with a fielder trying to make a play. This would result in Batter out and runners returning.

By OBR and MLBUM this is nonsense.

???

Rita
Poster is dead wrong in both (and all BB or SB) codes. This is not interference - this is a ball thrown out of play.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 20, 2013, 10:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 109
Not tricky, if the bat is in the way of a play at the Dish, and the PU has time, and can safely, carefully, clear the bat this would all be avoided. It is a drill that is practiced at the Jim Evans MLB Umpire School. It is being a good Game Manager.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 20, 2013, 10:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremeump View Post
Not tricky, if the bat is in the way of a play at the Dish, and the PU has time, and can safely, carefully, clear the bat this would all be avoided. It is a drill that is practiced at the Jim Evans MLB Umpire School. It is being a good Game Manager.
And if the cleared bat ends up in the way of the throw and the same play happens?

I'm not saying it's not good practice to clear the bat, when you can, and I am saying that good umpires learn this even if they don't go to Evans, just that it's not relevant to the play as presented.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 21, 2013, 10:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 109
Point taken. If the ball hits a cleared bat it is a 2B award with a dead ball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Oh dear...
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 22, 2013, 10:26am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremeump View Post
Point taken. If the ball hits a cleared bat and goes into DBT it is a 2b award TOT.
fify.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 22, 2013, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
Point taken. If a thrown ball hits a cleared bat and goes into DBT it is a 2b award TOT.
The bat is irrelevant. As was the post you corrected.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 23, 2013, 11:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremeump View Post
What is your input to the discussion ?? I am very offended at your very rude personal attack.

Please stay focused on topic!!!
You appeared to be saying that it's not interference only if the ball hits a cleared bat. I had the same thought as Mike.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 23, 2013, 08:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
You appeared to be saying that it's not interference only if the ball hits a cleared bat. I had the same thought as Mike.
Please advise, I am sorry and do not understand ? If you help me I can be a productive participant in many discussions.

Chuck
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One Question NCAA/NFHS, One Situation MOofficial Basketball 2 Mon Jan 31, 2011 01:30am
NFHS vs. NCAA chseagle Basketball 21 Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:50am
NFHS vs NCAA EEE Football 12 Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:57pm
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test ljudge Football 2 Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am
NCAA/NFHS rburn22281 Basketball 17 Tue Jun 04, 2002 12:41pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1