![]() |
|
|
|||
You appeared to be saying that it's not interference only if the ball hits a cleared bat. I had the same thought as Mike.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Quote:
Chuck |
|
|||
I tdoesn't matter wheather it was a cleared bat or an accidentally placed bat -- it's two bases TOT regardless
|
|
|||
The bat is irrelevant. As was the post you corrected.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Let's just say this. The statement you made above is false. If this was a T/F on a test, I would hope you would say False. A thrown ball hitting a bat (cleared or not) is simply a thrown ball hitting a bat. It is not a 2B award. it is not a dead ball.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
The OP has the ball going out of play, I do not know what Oh Dear Has to offer to the discussion ? Book rule is 2B @ TOT, I looked back at my post and see that I was not clear with that. What is the question that I should have false on ? I am sorry I have a hard time following you. Very Sorry for any confusion on my post.
|
|
|||
Quote:
It's this simple: You stated that if a ball hits a cleared bat, the runners get two bases. This statement is false. THAT is the question you should have false on, if it were asked on a test. 23) A thrown ball that hits a bat that has been cleared by the umpire. The umpire should award the runners 2 bases from the TOT. Answer: False. A ball that hits a cleared bat ... or an uncleared bat ... is not treated any differently than a ball that doesn't hit a cleared or uncleared bat. The bat is completely irrelevant.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
A thrown ball that hits a cleared bat ... or an uncleared bat ... is not treated any differently than a thrown ball that doesn't hit a cleared or uncleared bat. The bat is completely irrelevant. |
|
|||
Thank you, I have read and understand that my post was incomplete.
|
|
|||
Quote:
It is interference if a bat hits a batted ball. 6.05(h)
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One Question NCAA/NFHS, One Situation | MOofficial | Basketball | 2 | Mon Jan 31, 2011 01:30am |
NFHS vs. NCAA | chseagle | Basketball | 21 | Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:50am |
NFHS vs NCAA | EEE | Football | 12 | Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:57pm |
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test | ljudge | Football | 2 | Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am |
NCAA/NFHS | rburn22281 | Basketball | 17 | Tue Jun 04, 2002 12:41pm |