The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 29, 2013, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 18
Send a message via AIM to tommyleo
Is an on-deck batter required?

The Marlins had a walk-off no-hitter today. Crazy stuff. See here.

The Marlins' winning pitcher was actually on-deck when this happened. But considering the situation -- two out, bases loaded, bottom 9th, tie score -- he had absolutely no chance of batting in that inning. Yet there he was in the on-deck circle, swinging a weighted bat and wearing a helmet.

Discussing this with a friend tonight, he said that the next batter due up is required to be in the on-deck circle. When I asked him to cite the rule, he said that he had heard announcers talk about this requirement over the years. I reminded my friend that announcers sometimes get the rules wrong.

I could not find a rule mandating Major League hitters to be in the on-deck circle when due up next. Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 29, 2013, 10:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyleo View Post
The Marlins had a walk-off no-hitter today. Crazy stuff. See here.

The Marlins' winning pitcher was actually on-deck when this happened. But considering the situation -- two out, bases loaded, bottom 9th, tie score -- he had absolutely no chance of batting in that inning. Yet there he was in the on-deck circle, swinging a weighted bat and wearing a helmet.

Discussing this with a friend tonight, he said that the next batter due up is required to be in the on-deck circle. When I asked him to cite the rule, he said that he had heard announcers talk about this requirement over the years. I reminded my friend that announcers sometimes get the rules wrong.

I could not find a rule mandating Major League hitters to be in the on-deck circle when due up next. Am I missing something?
It's in the MLBUM:

ON-DECK CIRCLE
The next batter up must be in the on-deck circle, and this is the only player who should be there (i.e., not more than one player at a time).
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 29, 2013, 10:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 18
Send a message via AIM to tommyleo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
It's in the MLBUM:

ON-DECK CIRCLE
The next batter up must be in the on-deck circle, and this is the only player who should be there (i.e., not more than one player at a time).

Very interesting! Thanks.

This rule could be read two ways. On first glance, it would seem that the rule specifically mandates the on-deck batter to be in the on-deck circle the entire time the preceding batter is at bat. But perhaps this rule is only meant to control the on-deck batter's position on the field of play if he leaves the dugout (that is, making sure he stays in a defined area when not in the dugout). I have never seen an on-deck batter penalized or even warned for leaving the on-deck circle (perhaps to grab a different bat), so it would seem that the on-deck batter has the option, but not the obligation, to stand in the on-deck circle.

Also, is there a defined penalty for an on-deck batter not being in the on-deck circle?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 08:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
It's an administrative thing designed to reduce "game playing" and to speed up the game. It's meant to be enforced with a liberal amount of common sense.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 11:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
So in the Detroit/Miami game sitch, an umpire should stop the game until a batter shows up in the circle?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachP View Post
So in the Detroit/Miami game sitch, an umpire should stop the game until a batter shows up in the circle?
First, as I read the play, there was an on-deck batter.

Second, I'm not an MLB umpire, but my guess would be that the HP umpire or the umpire on that line, or the crew chief would just make a comment to the effect that "hey skip -- we need an on-deck batter" and continue the game. And this would be only if it was obviously a delay in sending one out.

(Similar to two on deck batters in college -- just a quiet "hey guys, only one, please" gets the job done.)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 12:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
Yes, he was there, but I was watching and wondering the same thing, WHY is he there?

In that sitch, if he WASN'T there, would the crew stop the game until someone showed up? (That's how I meant the question to come out, Bob!)

Not familiar with MLB rules, but if a PH was in the circle, is he now officially in the game? Or a better question would be, when is a PH officially in the game?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachP View Post
Yes, he was there, but I was watching and wondering the same thing, WHY is he there?

In that sitch, if he WASN'T there, would the crew stop the game until someone showed up? (That's how I meant the question to come out, Bob!)

Not familiar with MLB rules, but if a PH was in the circle, is he now officially in the game? Or a better question would be, when is a PH officially in the game?
When he's announced, or if he's not announced when:
(2) If a batter, he takes his place in the batter’s box;
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
Thanks Bob!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North, TX
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachP View Post
In that sitch, if he WASN'T there, would the crew stop the game until someone showed up?
If he wasn't there and the umpires didn't stop the game until he was, no one other than an umpire would have noticed/cared.

If he wasn't there and the umpires did stop the game until he was, everyone would have noticed/cared/criticized them for killing the flow of the game/OOO.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 12:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyleo View Post
Very interesting! Thanks.

This rule could be read two ways.
Not if you understand how the word "must" is used in the rulebook.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 03:25pm
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
It's entirely conceivable that Alvarez was taking his place in the on-deck circle to assist R3 (Stanton) with a Slide or Stand Up signal should play warrant it. I believe the rules allow the ODB to serve that purpose.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
It's entirely conceivable that Alvarez was taking his place in the on-deck circle to assist R3 (Stanton) with a Slide or Stand Up signal should play warrant it. I believe the rules allow the ODB to serve that purpose.
It's also conceivable (and quite likely) that he was taking his place in the on-deck circle because A) he was the next batter up and B) he (or someone) is required to be there.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 18
Send a message via AIM to tommyleo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
It's entirely conceivable that Alvarez was taking his place in the on-deck circle to assist R3 (Stanton) with a Slide or Stand Up signal should play warrant it. I believe the rules allow the ODB to serve that purpose.
I considered that, but I could not think of a (likely) play with bases loaded, tie score, and two out in the bottom of the 9th that would warrant an on-deck hitter to assist R3 -- especially when he's on-deck in front of the third-base dugout. R3 would typically score easily if the batter reaches first base safely. And even in the unlikely event of a dribbler in front of the mound (where the pitcher elects to try for the force play at home), R3 will have the entire play in front of him and the on-deck batter couldn't get in position fast enough to assist anyway.

On a WP or PB, the batter guides R3. No help needed from the on-deck batter -- unless (and here's is the ridiculously unlikely scenario)...

A WP barely misses the batter, who falls to the ground and can't get up because he tore something while avoiding the pitch. (Therefore, the batter can't assist the runner, as typically happens during a WP.) The third base coach can't help either because the ball caroms to a spot where the umpire or catcher is blocking the view of the ball of both the runner and that coach. However, the on-deck batter sees the play and can assist the runner. Happens all the time!

OK, so there was indeed an infinitesimal chance that an on-deck batter could have helped R3 there. Still doesn't explain why the deck-batter was swinging a bat.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 30, 2013, 04:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Why are we looking for a motive or some squirrelly reason that he was there.

He was there because that's what you do when you're next.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lead-off Batter = On-Deck Batter? Manny A Softball 14 Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:27am
on deck batter coach g Baseball 38 Tue Jul 20, 2010 01:40pm
On Deck Batter Duke Softball 4 Fri Apr 30, 2004 02:03pm
On Deck Batter Blue316 Baseball 4 Mon Jun 24, 2002 10:04am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1