The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 07:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
on deck batter

One of my ex-house league players was on-deck and after our batter reached 1B on an infield hit, the overthrow came near him. so he picked it up and tossed it to the pitcher. By this time, the runner from 3B had already scored. So the pitcher complains to the ump that the on-deck hitter touched a live ball, even though the play was essentially over.

The ump ruled the batter out and the runner must return to 3B, taking a run off the board. There was 1 out at the time this happened.

How badly did the umpire botch this play?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 07:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Well considering this was a house league, I am sure a MLB umpire was not doing the game. Digressing from there, the umpires decision was properly directly proportional to his experience.

Based upon my overall evauluation and assesment of a situation that one would have had to been there to opine upon, and the fact that I refuse to rip apart up and coming umpires.

I can't help you, sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 07:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

coach g,

How did the coaches respond to this sequence of events?

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 07:46pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Botched? Hmmmm....the on deck guy picked up a live ball with a runner still on base, so the play WASN'T over. Hopefully the on deck guy learned to leave the ball alone.
You didn't say in the OP where the original throw was headed on the "infield hit". Was the defense making a play at the plate on a runner from third? Or were they making a play in the batter-runner at first? Since it was an overthrow, was the batter-runner trying to advance? Did the runner from third advance on the hit, or on the overthrow?
Details, man. It's all about ALL the details.

Sorry, coach. Until all the details are posted, it's hard to render a decision.

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 08:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
At the time of INT, runner had already scored and batter runner at first. Kill the play, score the run, leave runner on first and tell the on deck guy not to do it again.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 09:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
the throw was wild to first. It had ended up in the on-deck circle and I called him over to tell him something. Next thing I know, the ball comes toward him and he picks it up. The runner at first was not trying to advance. The runner from 3rd scored as the ball was hit to the SS.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 15, 2010, 09:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 View Post
At the time of INT, runner had already scored and batter runner at first. Kill the play, score the run, leave runner on first and tell the on deck guy not to do it again.
Given the additional info, +1
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 16, 2010, 04:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 View Post
At the time of INT, runner had already scored and batter runner at first. Kill the play, score the run, leave runner on first and tell the on deck guy not to do it again.
Hmmmm...... Are we calling INTERFERENCE? Because if we do, shouldn't we be getting an out also?
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 16, 2010, 07:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Hmmmm...... Are we calling INTERFERENCE? Because if we do, shouldn't we be getting an out also?
It's offensive teammate interference without a play. The ball is dead, and the umpires will place the runners.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 17, 2010, 10:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
coach g,

How did the coaches respond to this sequence of events?

JM
I'd still like to see this question answered.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 17, 2010, 11:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
It's offensive teammate interference without a play. The ball is dead, and the umpires will place the runners.
I agree therefore the question. People will tend to call interference for this play and that requires an out. Hence, the point I am trying to make especially for the amount of rookies that are on this forum now.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 17, 2010, 06:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
I agree therefore the question. People will tend to call interference for this play and that requires an out. Hence, the point I am trying to make especially for the amount of rookies that are on this forum now.
You're not listening, oz. Interference without a play does not involve assessing an out.

From J/R, ch. 13, sect. VI:
With bases loaded a pitch eludes the catcher and rolls toward the on-deck batter. The runners each advance one base as the catcher pursues the ball. However, the on-deck batter reaches down and pick[s] up the live ball before the catcher can get to it: interference without a play being made. The ball is dead and the runners are restricted to their one-base advance.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 17, 2010, 08:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
the coaches, including me, were quiet. I knew the umps (kids) had not seen this play before and were making it up even though they consulted each other.

I think the consensus is since the play was essentially over, the ball should have been declared dead and the runner should not have been sent back to 3B. And I should have protested the game at that point. That way we could have re-started the game from there. But who wants to do that?

Thanks for the input.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 17, 2010, 09:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

coach g,

Thanks for answering my question.

As described, personally I'm impressed.

FWIW, I concur with mbyron & ozzy (who I believe are in "violent agreement") that a more proper call would have been (weak) "interference without a play" - kill it, put everyone where he is, mildly admonish the on-deck guy, reset and put the ball back in play.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 18, 2010, 12:00am
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
given the additional info, +1
+2
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On Deck Batter RKBUmp Softball 32 Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:36am
On-deck batter Hoosier_Dave Softball 5 Mon Jun 19, 2006 02:10pm
On Deck Batter DownTownTonyBrown Baseball 4 Mon May 05, 2003 06:42pm
On Deck Batter Blue316 Baseball 4 Mon Jun 24, 2002 10:04am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1