Ohio team schedules 2 quick games to get ejected player back for state

[Steven Tyler]

Originally Posted by BigUmp56

We're going to have to agree to disagree here. This entite matter is a symptom of a much larger generational problem. There is virtually NO accountibility anymore for young men and women when they cross the line. This kid steps out of bounds and swears at an adult who's been placed in an authoritative position, and it appears the entire system makes allowances for it. In the days I played baseball none of the kids I played baseball with would have gotten away with something like this. Our coaches and school administrators would have supprted the official, and an a$$kicking woyld have been the order of the day by our fathers.

Tim.

Nobody is disagreeing with you. They're telling you why they're right.

[BigUmp56]

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler

Nobody is disagreeing with you. They're telling you why they're right.

I thought that when people take up two different sides of a discussion the term best used to describe their differences is "disagreement". If you think otherwise, we'll just have to disagree.................

Tim.

[Steven Tyler]

Originally Posted by BigUmp56

I thought that when people take up two different sides of a discussion the term best used to describe their differences is "disagreement". If you think otherwise, we'll just have to disagree.................

Tim.

That would be true, but you always seem to get on the side of the fence that suits your agenda at the moment...........seen it too many times in the past...........instead of a discussion, you have axes you want to grind.

[BigUmp56]

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler

That would be true, but you always seem to get on the side of the fence that suits your agenda at the moment...........seen it too many times in the past...........instead of a discussion, you have axes you want to grind.

I have no idea what this means.

Seems to me that I've heard this before in this thread.....

Tim.

[Steve Meyer]

Originally Posted by BigUmp56

I have no idea what this means.

Seems to me that I've heard this before in this thread.....

Tim.

Don't know what you're reading, but that answer was pretty poignant, and straight forward as they come.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Steve Meyer

Don't know what you're reading, but that answer was pretty poignant, and straight forward as they come.

Steve Meyer and Steven Tyler. Sad that you have to use two user accounts to tag team another member.

Enjoy your vacation...together.

--Rich

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler

..instead of a discussion, you have axes you want to grind.

And you don't?

Your continued need to badger people over past things is getting old.

[w_sohl]

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler

Nobody is disagreeing with you. They're telling you why they're right.

Isn't that the definition of disagreeing? When they take a different stance and try to sell you on their belief?

[Adam]

Colorado is very clear on this. A student who is ejected is ineligible to play a game at any level until he/she misses the next scheduled game at the level where the ejection took place. IOW, if a player is ejected from a JV game, he cannot play any level until he misses the next scheduled JV game.

The rules specify, "A school may not schedule a contest after an ejection in order to circumvent the penalty."

IOW, the OP couldn't happen here. Frankly, I'm surprised all states don't have the same rule.

[johnnyg08]

Originally Posted by Adam

The rules specify, "A school may not schedule a contest after an ejection in order to circumvent the penalty."

So will they say...we just want to play, we're not circumventing the penalty.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by johnnyg08

So will they say...we just want to play, we're not circumventing the penalty.

No. If the game isn't already scheduled, then adding a game doesn't change the suspension.

But, in the OP, a team could "schedule" extra games between the playoff games. If someone is kicked out, play the games without the player. If no one is kicked out, then cancel the games.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

No. If the game isn't already scheduled, then adding a game doesn't change the suspension.

But, in the OP, a team could "schedule" extra games between the playoff games. If someone is kicked out, play the games without the player. If no one is kicked out, then cancel the games.

Assuming scheduled games between playoff games are allowed, then yes, this would be possible. This also assumes that all the players on the team aren't looking at their playing time limits.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Adam

Assuming scheduled games between playoff games are allowed, then yes, this would be possible. This also assumes that all the players on the team aren't looking at their playing time limits.

Both of those would be considerations in the OP as well.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by johnnyg08

So will they say...we just want to play, we're not circumventing the penalty.

Fine, then junior gets to sit those games, plus the game that was scheduled at the time of his suspension.

[Steven Tyler]

Originally Posted by w_sohl

Isn't that the definition of disagreeing? When they take a different stance and try to sell you on their belief?

I don't think you "sell" your beliefs............that's what those snake oil salesmen used to do (?), or a revival tent preacher. I don't like the term, "agree to disagree".