The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 17, 2013, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
I have nothing but a train wreck here. The contact happens because the catcher is in the act of receiving a throw. Just because the ball may be past him by a hair doesn't automatically make him guilty of OBS.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 17, 2013, 01:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
I have nothing but a train wreck here. The contact happens because the catcher is in the act of receiving a throw. Just because the ball may be past him by a hair doesn't automatically make him guilty of OBS.
1) Was he in the baserunner's path?
2) Did he have the ball?
3) Was he about to receive a ball?

Answer those questions, and then justify not calling OBS with a rule. Good luck.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 17, 2013, 03:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
1) Was he in the baserunner's path?
2) Did he have the ball?
3) Was he about to receive a ball?

Answer those questions, and then justify not calling OBS with a rule. Good luck.
1. Yes
2. No
3. Yes
______________ (equals)
OBS
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 17, 2013, 09:56pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
"about to receive" not relevant in FED and NCAA, you either have the ball or you don't if you are in the runner's path.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 18, 2013, 02:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
"about to receive" not relevant in FED and NCAA, you either have the ball or you don't if you are in the runner's path.
This is not correct for NCAA. A fielder "in the act of fielding the ball" is not guilty of obstruction (except on a pickoff).
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 18, 2013, 07:15pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
This is not correct for NCAA. A fielder "in the act of fielding the ball" is not guilty of obstruction (except on a pickoff).
Thank you for pointing that out.

Great rotation by U1.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 21, 2013, 07:17pm
Is this a legal title?
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
Thank you for pointing that out.

Great rotation by U1.
What makes a very basic textbook rotation "great"?

IMO, that is the dumbest rotation in the mechanics manual. What is so difficult, with the bases empty and an obvious extra-base hit in either 3-man or 4-man, with U1 entering the diamond and taking the plays on the B/R at 1st and 2nd, and U3 and PU both staying home?

All levels (pro, NCAA, FED) have umpires running all over the place for no good reason. If you're U1 and can't be at 2nd base from A in advance of the runner, retire.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 20, 2013, 08:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
"about to receive" not relevant in FED
True
Quote:
and NCAA.
False
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 17, 2013, 03:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
I have nothing but a train wreck here. The contact happens because the catcher is in the act of receiving a throw. Just because the ball may be past him by a hair doesn't automatically make him guilty of OBS.
umm - yes, it does
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
obstruction newump Baseball 19 Tue Jun 02, 2009 08:12am
CLE @ CIN 5-24, Obstruction? mbyron Baseball 37 Thu May 28, 2009 06:34pm
Obstruction ignored? mj Baseball 31 Fri May 22, 2009 11:22am
Obstruction? tarheelcoach Baseball 68 Sat Mar 24, 2007 08:35pm
ASA obstruction David Emerling Softball 39 Tue May 20, 2003 10:00am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1