Running Lane Violation. No call.

[RPatrino]

Originally Posted by dash_riprock

There is no need to determine if there is cheating going on. If the B/R's illegal position made it more difficult for F3 to make the play, I have INT.

Others have opined that they need more harm than that to call the foul. That's fine. It's a judgement thing.

This is what I had in my situation, and you opined that you didn't need more 'harm' than that to call it. Now you say don't call it. What do you really believe?

[dash_riprock]

Originally Posted by RPatrino

This is what I had in my situation, and you opined that you didn't need more 'harm' than that to call it. Now you say don't call it. What do you really believe?

In your situation F3 made the catch. Why would I call INT in that?

[RPatrino]

Let me try this a different way (just one more time). In your post you state, "If the B/R's illegal position made it more difficult for F3 to make the play, I have INT."

Did you fail to add, "if F3 cannot make the catch"?

[dash_riprock]

Ok I'll play your game. Yes. If F3 makes the play, I have no INT.

[RPatrino]

Thanks for playing. Had you posted more clearly there would have been no need to keep asking for clarification.