|
|||
Little League Mandatory Play question
I'm curious what the right ruling for a scenario I've got is. Using the tournament rules, on page T-17, rule 9. Suppose team A has 13 eligible players on their roster. Top of the first, catcher A2 is ejected for arguing balls and strikes. At this point, is each other player then required to play for 6 consecutive defensive outs as if the team only had 12 eligible players? Or would the team have to forfeit since not all uniformed, eligible (at the start of the game) players have gotten a turn to bat (which I can't see anyone ever calling)? What exactly would be the proper ruling here?
|
|
|||
Quote:
Given the page number you referenced you are looking at last year's book. Get a new one - the rule has changed for 13+ players.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Quote:
Also, mandatory play violations are no longer automatic forfeits. That went away about four years ago or so.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - rec league play pays off | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 21 | Thu Feb 24, 2011 05:50pm |
Non-Approved Bats in Local League Play | bigsig | Softball | 12 | Sat Nov 21, 2009 09:18pm |
LL Mandatory Play | aceholleran | Baseball | 32 | Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:33pm |
Little League District play sitch - Major division | mick | Baseball | 5 | Sun Jul 11, 2004 05:26pm |
Bush League Play | TwoBits | Baseball | 12 | Thu May 01, 2003 06:58am |