![]() |
|
|||
So here is the hybrid stance:
![]() As has already been pointed out, FED wants to eliminate this stance on the grounds that it meets the definition of neither legal stance. It is not a windup, since the free foot is not on or behind a line through the front of the rubber. It is not a set, since the pivot is not completely in contact with the rubber (the toes hanging off the front are illegal). Yes, the rule is written poorly, but no more poorly than OBR or NCAA. IMHO, a pitcher gets more advantage from being allowed to windup from this stance than if he sets. THAT (the hybrid windup) I will ball/balk every time. I don't see that he gets much advantage from using this stance as his set. Provided he complies with the rest of the rules concerning pitching from the set, having toes hanging off is no big deal.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/94079-hybrid-pitching-stance.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
Point of emphasis - Forums | This thread | Refback | Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:29pm | |
Point of emphasis - Forums | This thread | Refback | Wed Mar 06, 2013 08:46pm | |
Point of emphasis - Forums | This thread | Refback | Wed Mar 06, 2013 06:27pm | |
Point of emphasis - Forums | This thread | Refback | Wed Mar 06, 2013 05:39pm | |
Point of emphasis - Forums | This thread | Refback | Wed Mar 06, 2013 05:12pm |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Davis stance/K3C | DonInKansas | Baseball | 24 | Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:57pm |
Stance | mike1989 | Baseball | 20 | Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:08pm |
GD Stance | LLPA13UmpDan | Baseball | 42 | Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:15pm |
Gorilla Stance | blueump | Baseball | 49 | Thu Apr 14, 2005 07:56am |
Tim McClelland- New Stance | LeftyRef | Baseball | 14 | Tue Apr 12, 2005 08:55am |