The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by nopachunts View Post
After the bat breaks/shatters, does the batter have any control of where the pieces go other than what is left in his hands? Think about it.
Generally no, he doesn't - but that doesn't make the above rule fit the situation.

Also, in the OP, at the point the ball hit the bat, it was not shattered so much as just broken - and batters forward arm movement DID keep that broken piece moving forward. Not sure that applies at all, but he did have SOME control.

I'm not arguing the logic of the call, really... I'm just saying that the rule quoted by Rich and referred to by Oz is not the rule that applies.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 11:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
well,

Soon the "what ifs" will start.

T
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 12:16pm
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C View Post
Soon the "what ifs" will start.
As I'm sure they did when "The Big Unit" nailed that poor bird...
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 24, 2012, 07:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C View Post
Soon the "what ifs" will start.

T
What if we just watched the games and not have to scrutinize every facet of every play and call. Kind of like the game was supposed to be enjoyed. No replays, no slo-mo, just sit back and enjoy a day at the park.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
What if we just watched the games and not have to scrutinize every facet of every play and call. Kind of like the game was supposed to be enjoyed. No replays, no slo-mo, just sit back and enjoy a day at the park.
With the exception of truly learning from discussions, some people would not be able to enjoy their day of fame on the forum. It's like your presence on the field. Some feel they have to be noticed, others just do their job.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 78
Even though our eys don't really work in frames you could say at best the human eye can only detect 200 frames/second. This was filmed at 3000 fps. Thus the double hit would be impossible to visually detect and unlikely to be audible among the sounds of the initial hit of the bat the bat shattering. So in essence you don't need a rule because it is humanly impossible to discern this from any other broken bat batted ball.

The rule is written to deal with part of the bat that separates from the handle. In which case when both are still moving, it is a matter of perspective to say which hit the other.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 12:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by dileonardoja View Post
Even though our eys don't really work in frames you could say at best the human eye can only detect 200 frames/second.
Point of fact... Depending on what you're measuring, it's more like 10-15 frames per second. If you could see 200 frames per second individually, you would detect flicker in even the highest quality movies.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 23, 2012, 04:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Point of fact... Depending on what you're measuring, it's more like 10-15 frames per second. If you could see 200 frames per second individually, you would detect flicker in even the highest quality movies.
Completely wrong but this is not a human factors forum so I leave it at that
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broken Backboard! Nevadaref Basketball 20 Sat Jan 02, 2010 01:13pm
broken nose daveg144 Soccer 17 Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:52pm
Broken Net... Scatmaster Basketball 4 Mon Feb 12, 2007 04:11pm
Hunter Wendelstedt edman42 Baseball 3 Tue Jul 19, 2005 04:51pm
broken stick Tom Grady Lacrosse 2 Sun May 12, 2002 10:04pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1