|
|||
This is a bad miss and the umpire is moving and likely misses the perspective to make the call. We have all been there, but I would expect a little better mechanic from an MLB umpire that does not have to get to another base like most of us do in our games. Oh well, another day another dollar.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Rita |
|
|||
Quote:
Stopping the ESPN video at 00:39 and again at 00:43 seems to have him more toward the first base side of second. of course it doesn't follow all of his movement in the play. |
|
|||
Quote:
Problem is, I think he was genuinely surprised by the "pick-off" from right field, and completely unprepared for it. So he ran, and didn't see what he should have seen.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
I don't think the positioning was that bad, just where he was focusing his attention was probably wrong. IMO, he was looking at the hand and the base, and not the whole picture.
Good tags are made right before the base, but you can't anticipate that's where it's always going to take place. |
|
|||
Separate issue.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates Last edited by Kaliix; Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 01:07pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | Must C Call: Infante ruled safe on a close play - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker Last edited by Manny A; Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 01:25pm. |
|
|||
Ummm Maybe Im wrong but isint that now reviewable??
|
|
|||
Yes, but you get his point.
If you need a more realistic scenario, make it a walk-off double down the line that stayed in the park, but replays that cannot be reviewed show the ball was foul.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
You are correct I get his point, and I agree that their is a completely different feel going into the bottom of the inning with a 1-0 game vs a 3-0 game and yes momentum would have been with the Yankees. However to say OZZY is wrong for making his comment is ALSO wrong. Because infact he is correct. Take care of business in one of the first 8 innings and maybe that call wouldn't matter at all.
|
|
|||
I explained this to my 9 year old Saturday, and she got it. Umpires (should) get it much easier.
Some mistake made late in a game (whether by umpire or player or coach) is no more important than the same mistake made earlier. The umpire makes one mistake, but the Yankees failed to prevent one other run, and failed to get on base 27 other times (minus baserunning outs and DP's, I suppose). My daughter made the last out of her game the other day, a game they lost 14-12. Her out was not the reason they lost, even though she thought so. The rest of the team made 8 other outs (3 inning game). Their defense allowed 14 runs. ONE out, ONE mistake by the umpire, ONE hit by a player, ONE coach's error in sending a runner, pinch hitting, turning in the lineup in the first place, etc... does not cause a loss.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Was it a bad call? Yes, obviously. Did it cost the Yankee$ the game? No, obviously. You do have to score to win. In the 21 innings of this series so far, the Yankee$ have scored in 1 inning. That's right.. one. In their 78 official at-bats, they have 20 strikeouts. Yeah, the lack of "pressure" on the Detroit pitcher cost them the game. Sure, Joe. You betcha. Will it result in expanded replay? Yeah, probably, since it happened to the Yankee$!
__________________
Tom |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twins @ Tigers - interference call | Dakota | Baseball | 52 | Fri Sep 28, 2012 08:43am |
ML blown call? | alex7 | Baseball | 19 | Wed Aug 12, 2009 07:24pm |
Tigers vs Injuns 5-1-09 Laz Diaz? no-call | jwwashburn | Baseball | 68 | Sat May 09, 2009 09:41pm |
U2 Blown Call | Cubbies87 | Baseball | 17 | Tue May 04, 2004 11:56am |
was it a blown call? | Ruben Trinidad | Basketball | 11 | Sat Feb 17, 2001 09:16pm |