|
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:31am
|
|||
|
|||
|
The back foot clearly disengages the rubber before the feint to 1st. I think what makes the play look odd to some people is that during the feint to 3rd, there is no accompanting arm action. According to Jim Evans, this is not a requirement. An odd-looking play from the mound does not always equal a balk.
Next year this will be a balk in MLB if I read correctly. So use it while you can. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Substitution on Overturned HR | yawetag | Baseball | 7 | Tue Sep 13, 2011 07:19am |
| NU v. Creighton Overturned call | SperlingPE | Baseball | 1 | Fri May 20, 2005 08:51pm |
| CWS ejection overturned | tornado | Baseball | 13 | Wed Jun 30, 2004 04:38pm |
| Potential for overturned decision | sout bay 101 | Basketball | 5 | Sun Feb 01, 2004 11:59pm |
| Worst rule later overturned? | utex | Basketball | 21 | Mon May 06, 2002 11:10pm |
Threaded Mode
