Thread: Overturned Balk
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:31am
rbmartin rbmartin is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
The back foot clearly disengages the rubber before the feint to 1st. I think what makes the play look odd to some people is that during the feint to 3rd, there is no accompanting arm action. According to Jim Evans, this is not a requirement. An odd-looking play from the mound does not always equal a balk.

Next year this will be a balk in MLB if I read correctly. So use it while you can.
Reply With Quote