The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
That's a Balk

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
The back foot clearly disengages the rubber before the feint to 1st. I think what makes the play look odd to some people is that during the feint to 3rd, there is no accompanting arm action. According to Jim Evans, this is not a requirement. An odd-looking play from the mound does not always equal a balk.

Next year this will be a balk in MLB if I read correctly. So use it while you can.
The pitcher cannot step onto the rubber with both hands together. So you guys are saying that if the pitcher steps off the front of the rubber with his hands together, it's not a balk. He steps off the rubber and does not legally feint to third. He is still ready to pitch when he wheels around to first base. That's a balk. Also, F3 isn't holding the runner on 1B, so holding the ball after making such a move is a balk!

Comment Clarification: (j) The pitcher, after coming to a legal pitching position, removes one hand from the ball other than in an actual pitch, or in throwing to a base. Once legally positioned or set, the pitcher must keep both hands (gloved and bare) together until he pitches, attempts a pick-off or other play or steps off the rubber.

Excellent example: http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=14523967

Why is this a balk? http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=22128067
__________________
SAump

Last edited by SAump; Mon Oct 01, 2012 at 01:00am.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump View Post
The pitcher cannot step onto the rubber with both hands together. So you guys are saying that if the pitcher steps off the front of the rubber with his hands together, it's not a balk. He steps off the rubber and does not legally feint to third. He is still ready to pitch when he wheels around to first base. That's a balk. Also, F3 isn't holding the runner on 1B, so holding the ball after making such a move is a balk!
So we're just making up our own rules now....wonderful.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
There was no balk here and I do not understand why all of a sudden, the 3rd to 1st move is so difficult for people and umpires to deal with. It seems that I woke up one morning and the world turned stupid! It's a legal move designed to deceive the runner at 1st and getting an out.
Is it that or fans don't like seeing it? Also, it helps to stop some of the deliberate delay. I'm just guessing if these may be reasons for getting rid of it. That and the fact that 99% of them are a waste of time b/c the pitchers give it away long before they even attempt it.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump View Post
The pitcher cannot step onto the rubber with both hands together. So you guys are saying that if the pitcher steps off the front of the rubber with his hands together, it's not a balk. He steps off the rubber and does not legally feint to third. He is still ready to pitch when he wheels around to first base. That's a balk. Also, F3 isn't holding the runner on 1B, so holding the ball after making such a move is a balk!
I count six sentences above. Only the first is true, but it's not relevant to the play, and it's not a balk to step onto the rubber with the hands together.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I count six sentences above. Only the first is true, but it's not relevant to the play, and it's not a balk to step onto the rubber with the hands together.
Thank you for being gentle to the poster. I hope he gets it.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 99
I think Chad thought he fainted a throw to first and did not see the pitcher faint to 3rd prior to.....
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2012, 10:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 99
I thing saumps is saying is that a pitcher cannot, from the set, straddle the rubber, put his hands together, then engage the rubber, then separate his hands.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Distance and direction?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Well.. he was wrong, wasn't he?

I'm trying hard to find "it looks like a jabstep" or even "it looks different than I'm used to" in my rulebook, and can't find it.

He CLEARLY disengages at 1:04-05 in the video. And not just by a little bit - his foot moves toward third by about half the length of the rubber. If you don't see that, I can't help you.
I agree he steps from the far edge of the rubber on the first base side to the middle of the rubber. But I don't think that he has legally disengaged the rubber. Has he gained any distance toward 3B if his foot clearly lands in front of the rubber?

His back foot is closer to 3B after he turns to fake a throw back to first base. You'll notice it passed the rear edge of the rubber on the third base side. Shouldn't the pitcher move his lead foot off the edge of the rubber to gain distance and direction before his throw or feint?
__________________
SAump

Last edited by SAump; Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 02:03am.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
No. No.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
MLB 8.01c
"At any time during the pitcher’s preliminary movements and until his natural
pitching motion commits him to the pitch, he may throw to any base provided he steps directly toward such base before making the throw."

As long as he steps and gains distance, then disengages the plate, it doesn't matter where he ends up. It does not stipulate that the pitcher needs to clear the end of the plate.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by GA Umpire View Post
Is it that or fans don't like seeing it? Also, it helps to stop some of the deliberate delay. I'm just guessing if these may be reasons for getting rid of it. That and the fact that 99% of them are a waste of time b/c the pitchers give it away long before they even attempt it.
Actually, GA, I can see where the fans have a hard time dealing with this but they still thing a base award is the base you were going to plus one.

What surprises me is how umpires, who should be able to break this move down on the spot and rule correctly, can't even understand when F1 is set, on or off the rubber -- sigh.... I was right. I woke up one morning and the world got stupid while I slept.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 29, 2012, 04:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Actually, GA, I can see where the fans have a hard time dealing with this but they still thing a base award is the base you were going to plus one.

What surprises me is how umpires, who should be able to break this move down on the spot and rule correctly, can't even understand when F1 is set, on or off the rubber -- sigh.... I was right. I woke up one morning and the world got stupid while I slept.
No kidding. I can not believe some of the posts I am reading here. This is not a balk.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 30, 2012, 08:47am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Well.. he was wrong, wasn't he?

I'm trying hard to find "it looks like a jabstep" or even "it looks different than I'm used to" in my rulebook, and can't find it.

He CLEARLY disengages at 1:04-05 in the video. And not just by a little bit - his foot moves toward third by about half the length of the rubber. If you don't see that, I can't help you.
Perhaps I don't understand what a jab-step entails.

Suppose this pitcher never made that initial move to third. Wouldn't his disengagement of his pivot foot toward third while he turns, steps and throws to first be a jab-step?
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 05, 2012, 06:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Step off, step back or back off?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
But when he made his fake to third, he never disengaged his pivot foot from the rubber. His subsequent move to first looked just like a jab-step, because the pivot foot disengaged simultaneously as he was making the move to first. At least that's how it looked to me.

From 8.05(c): "However, if, with runners on first and third, the pitcher, while in contact with the rubber, steps toward third and then immediately and in practically the same motion “wheels” and throws to first base, it is obviously an attempt to deceive the runner at first base, and in such a move it is practically impossible to step directly toward first base before the throw to first base, and such a move shall be called a balk. Of course, if the pitcher steps off the rubber and then makes such a move, it is not a balk.

This pither, IMO, did not step off the rubber before making the move to first. He started his move to first with a jab-step, which comes simultaneously with the move.
I think you nailed him simulating a pickoff to third, but the other folks here seem to think he legally disengaged from the rubber. They claim Jim Evans says it legal, so it's legal, right?
__________________
SAump

Last edited by SAump; Fri Oct 05, 2012 at 06:22am.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 05, 2012, 11:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump View Post
I think you nailed him simulating a pickoff to third, but the other folks here seem to think he legally disengaged from the rubber. They claim Jim Evans says it legal, so it's legal, right?
Why can't he feint to third? What is illegal about that?

It's legal because he disengages before throwing to first base. Can you show me where his foot was still on the rubber while he was throwing to first?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Substitution on Overturned HR yawetag Baseball 7 Tue Sep 13, 2011 07:19am
NU v. Creighton Overturned call SperlingPE Baseball 1 Fri May 20, 2005 08:51pm
CWS ejection overturned tornado Baseball 13 Wed Jun 30, 2004 04:38pm
Potential for overturned decision sout bay 101 Basketball 5 Sun Feb 01, 2004 11:59pm
Worst rule later overturned? utex Basketball 21 Mon May 06, 2002 11:10pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1