Simple question, but can't find answer

[BadAxe]

"In this situation I don't see the coach interfering with the throw, the throw was wild as stated and hit the coach, not the coach hitting the ball. "


He said the coach kicked the ball. Wouldn't that be the coach interfering? He didn't interfer with the throw, but it definitely sounds as if he interfered with the ball while it was rolling in the field of play. If he didn't kick it, I guess it shoulda read "The ball hit him in the foot". Anyway, I defer to you guys for the ruling on the play, I just wanted to state that it does sound as if the base coach interfered with the ball while it was still in play.