The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2012, 08:05am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve View Post
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, then everyday would be Christmas. It is what it is...we live in an age of technology, and calls that would never be questioned 50 years ago are now brought into the light of day like never before. The fact is that we have these multiple camera angles, and managers have access to the replay immediately after the play happens. That's why they pay the MLB umpires the big bucks. While it may be unfair for the umpires to be subject to such scrutiny, that's the way it's going to be, so they have to be ready for it every time they make a call, unfortunately.
Regardless, the BS that umpires are worse now than they were X years ago is simply that: BS.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2012, 09:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by GROUPthink View Post
Regardless, the BS that umpires are worse now than they were X years ago is simply that: BS.
Agreed, but the additional scrutiny is what leads to the call for replay, and that, as much as I don't like it, is an irresistible force that will result in expansion of replay eventually.

Following the NFL model, where the crew chief goes "under the hood" to review the play and make a decision is where it all goes off the rails with respect to baseball, IMO. All of the issues raised about the difficulty of reversing a call in baseball are legitimate.

It just seems to me that if the replay umpire is treated like any other member of the crew (with the exception that he has no primary call responsibility, but is just another pair of eyes on the play), who then provides the crew chief with his additional information and allows the on-field crew to decide what, if anything, to do with this information, fits baseball to a "T". It adds no additional delay, has no one going "under the hood", creates no new conundrum over placing runners over what already exists, and would allow many calls to be "fixed".

Would it satisfy all fans, managers, players? Would it fix all "bad" calls? Of course not. But it would be workable, IMO.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2012, 11:03am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GROUPthink View Post
Regardless, the BS that umpires are worse now than they were X years ago is simply that: BS.
ITA. The umpires of the past kicked more than their fair share of calls.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Detroit vs Toronto rbmartin Baseball 26 Wed Jun 29, 2011 08:23am
OT: Detroit Red Wings Win Stanley Cup 26 Year Gap Basketball 14 Thu Jun 05, 2008 04:36pm
UWM vs. Detroit-Traveling? ByTheBook Basketball 9 Thu Mar 10, 2005 01:09pm
buffalo detroit game ref5678 Football 5 Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:02pm
Detroit-NJ BktBallRef Basketball 7 Sat May 24, 2003 01:27pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1