The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 05:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Spring,Tx
Posts: 25
what would you call?

Here is the situation...Jr high level...I was asked this from another umpire..

R3 is stealing on the pitch (sqeeze play)..the catcher takes position infront of the plate before the pitch crosses the plate ( never giving the batter a chance at the ball), R3 scores due to the catcher dropping the ball....what would you call...I already got different answers from other umpires...
__________________
You'll get nothing and like it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 05:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
If the pitcher didn't step off before throwing home, that would be a catcher's balk.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 05:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandotheman View Post
Here is the situation...Jr high level...I was asked this from another umpire..

R3 is stealing on the pitch (sqeeze play)..the catcher takes position infront of the plate before the pitch crosses the plate ( never giving the batter a chance at the ball), R3 scores due to the catcher dropping the ball....what would you call...I already got different answers from other umpires...
Catcher's obstruction (FED), Batter to 1B, R3 scores.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 05:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Spring,Tx
Posts: 25
I also have catchers balk as well....runner scores and the batter remains at bat...
You can say catchers obstuction, but then you would penalize the defense twice...runner scores and now the batter goes to 1st?
__________________
You'll get nothing and like it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 05:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
No balk under HS rules.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 05:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjim View Post
Catcher's obstruction (FED), Batter to 1B, R3 scores.
Agree!

That's obstruction, and due to the fact R3 was stealing on the obstruction, score 1, batter gets 1.

In response to mandotheman, you are not penalizing the defense twice. The defense erred on a possible squeeze play. By not penalizing the obstruction on the possibilities of an offensive advantage, you actually penalize the offense.
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 06:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
No balk under HS rules.
Really, Gracie??
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 06:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Calling a balk because the catcher left the front of the box on this would be a stretch. The catcher can leave the box at TOP so more than likely he was in the box. CO is the correct rule to apply here.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 10:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Really, Gracie??
8-1-1-e-1 plus the definition of squeeze

On CO only runners attempting to advance (inncluding on a squeeze) are advanced. Others only advance if forced.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 10, 2012, 11:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjim View Post
Calling a balk because the catcher left the front of the box on this would be a stretch. The catcher can leave the box at TOP so more than likely he was in the box. CO is the correct rule to apply here.
Except for FED, it's a balk because the rule says it's a balk.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 11, 2012, 08:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Don't we have both? A "catcher's balk" and obstruction by the catcher?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 11, 2012, 08:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
So if the catcher reaches across the plate and obstructs the batter on a squeeze you are going to call CO but if he steps on home plate in the same situation you are going to call a balk?
The criteria for that balk BTW allows the catcher out of the box right after time of pitch. This is not a balk most umpires look for. It could be called with catchers setting up for outside pitches, pitchouts and even catchers that extend one leg out to get lower but the TOP criteria usually is met in those sits.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 11, 2012, 08:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Don't we have both? A "catcher's balk" and obstruction by the catcher?
So we move all runners up 1 and award BR 1st?

On a balk, only the runners are moved up. What about B2 who's opportunity for a hit (bunt single) was taken away?

Obstruction awards the stealing runner and batter a base and others if forced, which seems to be a more advantageous penalty for the defenses error.

I didn't think NFHS used the term "catcher's balk"? I don't have my book
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 11, 2012, 09:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
To those advocating for a balk here: the OP does not state that F2 left the box before F1 released the pitch.

Without more info in support of the balk, it sounds like garden-variety catcher INT/OBS to me.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 11, 2012, 09:40am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Don't we have both? A "catcher's balk" and obstruction by the catcher?
If you have a balk the ball becomes immediately dead is the reason you can't have obstruction in FED. The play didn't happen. The batter doesn't go to first, all runners advance one base. Simple as that.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The right call or the correct call? Nevadaref Basketball 9 Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21am
ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection DaveASA/FED Softball 28 Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm
To call or not to call foul ball DaveASA/FED Softball 11 Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am
More Pacers/Pistons call/no call OverAndBack Basketball 36 Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm
Does one call relate to the last call? Tee Basketball 28 Thu Feb 13, 2003 05:53pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1