|
|||
what would you call?
Here is the situation...Jr high level...I was asked this from another umpire..
R3 is stealing on the pitch (sqeeze play)..the catcher takes position infront of the plate before the pitch crosses the plate ( never giving the batter a chance at the ball), R3 scores due to the catcher dropping the ball....what would you call...I already got different answers from other umpires...
__________________
You'll get nothing and like it. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I also have catchers balk as well....runner scores and the batter remains at bat...
You can say catchers obstuction, but then you would penalize the defense twice...runner scores and now the batter goes to 1st?
__________________
You'll get nothing and like it. |
|
|||
Agree!
That's obstruction, and due to the fact R3 was stealing on the obstruction, score 1, batter gets 1. In response to mandotheman, you are not penalizing the defense twice. The defense erred on a possible squeeze play. By not penalizing the obstruction on the possibilities of an offensive advantage, you actually penalize the offense.
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words". |
|
|||
8-1-1-e-1 plus the definition of squeeze
On CO only runners attempting to advance (inncluding on a squeeze) are advanced. Others only advance if forced.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Except for FED, it's a balk because the rule says it's a balk.
|
|
|||
Don't we have both? A "catcher's balk" and obstruction by the catcher?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
So if the catcher reaches across the plate and obstructs the batter on a squeeze you are going to call CO but if he steps on home plate in the same situation you are going to call a balk?
The criteria for that balk BTW allows the catcher out of the box right after time of pitch. This is not a balk most umpires look for. It could be called with catchers setting up for outside pitches, pitchouts and even catchers that extend one leg out to get lower but the TOP criteria usually is met in those sits. |
|
|||
Quote:
On a balk, only the runners are moved up. What about B2 who's opportunity for a hit (bunt single) was taken away? Obstruction awards the stealing runner and batter a base and others if forced, which seems to be a more advantageous penalty for the defenses error. I didn't think NFHS used the term "catcher's balk"? I don't have my book
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words". |
|
|||
To those advocating for a balk here: the OP does not state that F2 left the box before F1 released the pitch.
Without more info in support of the balk, it sounds like garden-variety catcher INT/OBS to me.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
If you have a balk the ball becomes immediately dead is the reason you can't have obstruction in FED. The play didn't happen. The batter doesn't go to first, all runners advance one base. Simple as that.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The right call or the correct call? | Nevadaref | Basketball | 9 | Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21am |
ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 28 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm |
To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |
More Pacers/Pistons call/no call | OverAndBack | Basketball | 36 | Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm |
Does one call relate to the last call? | Tee | Basketball | 28 | Thu Feb 13, 2003 05:53pm |