|
Sun Apr 08, 2012, 11:14am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Runner must touch base?
Would the right word, abandonment, have changed the outcome?
Padres protest accepted, then withdrawn. Padres withdraw protest over D-backs' walk-off | padres.com: News Padres protested the runner must touch third base. Denied due to 4.09b. Not that I disagree with the 4.09b, nor allowing a run to score AFTER the third out was made after BOB awards. But allowing the runner to run off the baseline and to apply no penalty on the runner when he should touch the next base, should matter. Someone on the Padres might call this a clear case of abandonment, before the run legally scored. Clarification needed why the third out, inconsequential as it may be, was not granted.
__________________
SAump 
Last edited by SAump; Sun Apr 08, 2012 at 12:06pm. 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does not touch first base | Zoochy | Baseball | 15 | Tue Jul 06, 2010 07:13pm |
| Runner returning to touch missed base | ncaaumpdj | Softball | 2 | Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:52am |
| must obstructed runner physically touch base? | Tru_in_Blu | Softball | 18 | Sun Jan 17, 2010 05:13pm |
| runner returning to touch base | shipwreck | Softball | 15 | Fri Mar 29, 2002 09:14am |
| Base touch responsibilities | Roger Greene | Softball | 2 | Thu Mar 01, 2001 09:58pm |
Threaded Mode
