The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 13, 2011, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Obstruction then appeal

Fed rule set.
Scenario # 1 : Batter hits a gapper to outfield. After rounding but missing 2nd, BR is obstructed by F6 and subsequently tagged out at 3rd. Do you award BR 3rd on obstruction , then allow defense to appeal missed base previous to obstruction?

Scenario # 2 : Batter hits a gapper to outfield. Before rounding but missing 2nd, BR is obstructed by F3 and then subsequently tagged out at 3rd. How do you sort this out?

Last edited by rbmartin; Thu Oct 13, 2011 at 11:53am. Reason: spelling error
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 13, 2011, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

rbmartin,

If the obstruction was the proximate cause of the obstructed runner missing the base, an appeal of the miss should not be upheld. This is most likely to occur when the runner is just shy of a base when obstructed or he is obstructed at the base.

Otherwise, the runner, even though obstructed, is still responsible for touching the bases in order on his advance or retreat.

In both your sitches, you would award the runner the base you feel he would have obtained absent the obstruction (since it's FED, a minimum of one base beyond his position at the time he was obstructed), then call him out if the defense properly appeals.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 13, 2011, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
rbmartin,

If the obstruction was the proximate cause of the obstructed runner missing the base, an appeal of the miss should not be upheld. This is most likely to occur when the runner is just shy of a base when obstructed or he is obstructed at the base.

Otherwise, the runner, even though obstructed, is still responsible for touching the bases in order on his advance or retreat.

In both your sitches, you would award the runner the base you feel he would have obtained absent the obstruction (since it's FED, a minimum of one base beyond his position at the time he was obstructed), then call him out if the defense properly appeals.

JM
agreed. The obstruction can't have caused the missed base in the first play; it's unlikely in the second (it's difficult for OBS by F3 to be the proximate cause of missing second; had the OBS been by F4 or F6 it would be more likely).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obstruction on an Appeal? illiniwek8 Softball 5 Thu Jul 01, 2010 08:05am
appeal at first jophyal Baseball 3 Mon May 24, 2010 07:41pm
appeal on hr bellsjc Baseball 10 Tue May 13, 2008 07:53am
4th Out Appeal cshs81 Baseball 7 Sun May 06, 2007 05:33pm
Appeal this spots101 Baseball 4 Tue Feb 18, 2003 11:18pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1