Infield fly situation

mbyron · #1 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 01:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

When did a live fair batted ball leave the field?

Ah, you're killing it when it's kicked? Based on....?

MD Longhorn · #2 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 01:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron

Ah, you're killing it when it's kicked? Based on....?

Let me ask you this... the status of the ball is nothing until it becomes something, yes? So despite the fact that we WILL have IFF if the ball stays fair, at the instant the ball hits the batter, we do not have IFF. Live batter hit by live ball in fair territory - what do YOU do?

kylejt · #3 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 01:55pm

You have but two choices: Call the BR out on the IFF, because the fair ball is dead once it touches him, OR call him out for INT. You can't get two outs on the same guy, so I'd go for the later.

It's that simple.

mbyron · #4 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 02:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

Let me ask you this... the status of the ball is nothing until it becomes something, yes? So despite the fact that we WILL have IFF if the ball stays fair, at the instant the ball hits the batter, we do not have IFF. Live batter hit by live ball in fair territory - what do YOU do?

Relax, Mike, I'm just playing.

What's weird about the case is that the BR is not out until the ball is fair (IFF), but it's not fair until he's out (INT).

To put it otherwise: the ball touching him both makes it fair and makes him guilty of INT.

I like INT.

MD Longhorn · #5 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 02:18pm

This play could have been a lot more interesting, with, I suspect, people landing on both sides of the argument.

Say, for example, R2 was off on the pitch, and had actually crossed 3rd before the ball hit the ground - and was just short of home when the ball contacted BR. Now what do you do with the runners?

And if you've got that one straight, now have R1 similarly off base, when BR actually interferes INTENTIONALLY with F1 making the catch.

rbmartin · #6 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 03:23pm

Quote:

7.09 (f) It is interference by a batter or a runner when any batter or runner who has just been put out hinders or impedes any following play being made on a runner. Such runner shall be declared out for the interference of his teammate; If the batter or a runner continues to advance after he has been put out, he shall not by that act alone be considered as confusing, hindering or impeding the fielders.

Could one argue that a runner should also be declared out as a result of this interference? I guess not since the ball would be immediately dead?

MD Longhorn · #7 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 03:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbmartin

Could one argue that a runner should also be declared out as a result of this interference? I guess not since the ball would be immediately dead?

Not really, because we have more obvious reasons to call this interference already. Barring intent, I cannot see getting a 2nd out here.

rbmartin · #8 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 26, 2011, 08:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

Barring intent, I cannot see getting a 2nd out here.

Does 7.09(f) require intent?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Infield Fly situation	TwoDot	Baseball	4	Fri Jul 15, 2005 02:44pm
Another infield fly situation...	Rbn3	Baseball	3	Tue May 18, 2004 05:43pm
Infield(er) Fly	CecilOne	Softball	17	Sat Mar 29, 2003 07:14pm
Infield Fly Situation	dan_renninger	Softball	1	Fri Mar 15, 2002 05:43pm
infield fly	Robert G	Baseball	2	Wed May 02, 2001 10:17pm