![]() |
|
|
|||
It looks like Joe West caught on to the deficiency in the IR rule by the time of his postgame statement where he contended Manuel asked for a replay to see if it was a HR. Manuel was adamant that he did not. Nobody in the park thought it was ever a HR, the only question was if there was fan interference. And the rule was not written to cover that. It was meant to overturn the HR call that the Maier kid interfered with by the way it is worded. Nevertheless it was the consensus of the ESPN crew that the protest would not be upheld, mainly because "they got the call right".
|
|
|||
Therefore we all know this cannot be the reason it's not upheld... since we all know that any utterance of an announcer is automatically wrong.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Phillies 23, Cubs 22.... | ASA/NYSSOBLUE | Baseball | 8 | Mon May 18, 2009 11:33am |
Phillies - Brewers Interference | SRW | Softball | 14 | Tue Oct 07, 2008 04:56pm |
Phillies & Braves, 7/11 | mrm21711 | Baseball | 3 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 10:11am |
protest ruling | Wallyjay | Baseball | 6 | Thu Jul 25, 2002 03:17am |
Ineligible Pitchers Protest--Ruling Help | jpshaughnessy | Baseball | 11 | Mon May 28, 2001 10:39am |