The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbfoulds View Post
IN MOST CASES [read: most ball parks, esp. pro fields], if a fly ball clears a CF boundary obstacle [fence, wall, etc.] and returns to the field of play somehow, there is gonna be a "ground rule" [i.e.: a pre-determined ruling specific to that field and that obstacle] which covers it: hence the term "ground Rule double".
There's no ground rule in any enclosed field that would supersede the rule book: Four bases in flight; two bases on the bounce.

I believe Larry (I may regret defending him) was commenting whether Busch Stadium's ground rules state where the home run line is for the outfield walls. In this hit, the ball either bounced off the top of the padded wall or it hit the cement wall behind the padded wall; after doing one of the two, it came back toward the outfield. Ground rules would determine which wall it had to clear. If it didn't clear the correct wall, it would be an alive ball, with runners getting what they can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbfoulds View Post
apparently, the commentator YOU CITED seemed to think this was such a sitch: if the ball was NOT a HR, it would be a GR double.
You don't know Mike Shannon, do you? Here's a sample.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 11:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
The commentator I referred to was Jim Deshaies who works with Bill Brown on Houston TV.

MLB said that from now on, the ball has to clear the small concrete strip that the padding does not cover. Hard to say why it would ever have been deemed otherwise. If the same ball was hit today, it would be IN PLAY, as it should have been in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry1953 View Post
The commentator I referred to was Jim Deshaies who works with Bill Brown on Houston TV.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry1953 View Post
Cards announcer Mike Shannon reviewed the replay and immediately said it just hit the top of the wall and on review "it will probably end up a ground rule double with the runner who was sure to score being sent back to third.
Which was it?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 12:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
Which was it?
It was Deshaies who said that it was better to let the ball stay in play, knowing that if replay shows it was a HR, it is an easy matter just to send all runners home.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reviewed play in Greenbay game today DrMooreReferee Football 4 Mon Dec 10, 2007 01:49pm
Florida TD Reviewed Rick KY Football 6 Fri Jan 12, 2007 02:29pm
Why wasn't the Texas TD reviewed?? MJT Football 19 Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:58pm
Cincinnati-Memphis State - 3 Reviewed Jake80 Basketball 8 Thu Mar 11, 2004 01:15pm
Albert Pujols suspension TriggerMN Baseball 4 Tue Aug 26, 2003 05:34pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1