![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
After being "thrown out" the runner immediately started heading for the dugout. That tells me that HE did not feel he was obstructed.
I also agree with 2 previous posters. F6 standing where he did only invites trouble. Last edited by rbmartin; Tue Jun 14, 2011 at 08:58am. |
|
|||
|
That's the proper call, with the proper timing.
Plus, you have to judge how much OBS it was, and did it effect the outcome. With a slight variance in the runners step, and the close play at third, you always lead toward the runner. Use this video for training, all you instructors out there. It's a great example of type b OBS, and how it's handled. |
|
|||
|
I don't do much (if any) OBR, I work mostly FED. Do you take into account at all if there is a play being made on him?
I.E. F8 picks up the ball and just lobs it into F6, you keep your hand down and avoid the "it was OBS, but all he gets is 3B," or do you point it out and hope we all just move on?
__________________
Ump Rube ----------------------------------------------------- Ump (uhmp) shorted form; an official in a sport who rules on plays. Rube (roob) slang; sports fan who listens to KFAN in Minneapolis, MN. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
This situation is Type B. You call it, then fix it when the play is over. If he had reached 3B safely, you simply let it go. Fed is different. ALL OBS is similar to Type B in OBR. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
What if in your play R3 sees the lob to F6 and keeps running for home and is out on a close play? Are you *now* going to try to tell everyone there was OBS? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You treat it like Type B, but award it like Type A, so there's a bit more judgment involved there. In your situation above, go ahead and call it, in other situations, I wouldn't call it...but to discuss those, would hijack the thread.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
|
Quote:
On that note, maybe we do agree, but I'm interpreting your post to say that since the runner didn't argue, then it must not be OBS.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
|
All that tells me is that he did not think that obstruction was called. It tells me nothing as to whether he did or did not feel he was obstructed.
|
|
|||
|
The question of timing is relevant. We all call things when they register with our brain. Well, I've called a few before then but that's a different matter. Layne did not react well and aggressively to this play. There is no doubt that he is one of the very best but this was not an example of obstruction being called in MLB lately. There are plenty of examples and almost all involve adamant verbalizations and signaling.
As for the runner giving up and walking away, I don't think that's a huge consideration. He was out, he knew it and most players don't know rule enforcement like we do. He should have been pissed at himself for getting caught after he slowed approaching and rounding second. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You need a casual call, with no theatrics for type b. The only thing I would have done differently is point with my left hand. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obstruction Call Mets/Phillies | njdevs00cup | Baseball | 21 | Fri May 08, 2009 02:04pm |
| Reds vs. Pirates..appeal play | rbmartin | Baseball | 4 | Sat Sep 01, 2007 02:41am |
| Illegal slide into Pirates' F6 | SAump | Baseball | 8 | Wed Aug 29, 2007 01:07am |
| Pirates @ Astros -- Garner Ejection | tmp44 | Baseball | 7 | Sat Apr 22, 2006 05:46pm |