The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 05, 2011, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Yes, you always have an out on this play, but with less than 2 outs you nail RUNNER and with 2 outs you nail BATTER.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 480
Say no outs, runner is put out as a result of the BR interference, what happens to BR then, does he contnue to bat?
__________________
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
Chris Z.
Detroit/SE Michigan
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 31, 2011, 02:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robmoz View Post
Say no outs, runner is put out as a result of the BR interference, what happens to BR then, does he contnue to bat?
Yes.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 01, 2011, 10:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robmoz View Post
Say no outs, runner is put out as a result of the BR interference, what happens to BR then, does he contnue to bat?
The BI occured when the batter hit the ball. Resulting action from that point on is null. Enforce the out on the batter. Return the runner.
__________________
"That's all I have to say about that."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 01, 2011, 10:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
If the runner never actually broke for home, wouldn't this just be a balk.
The pitcher made a pitching motion while not on the rubber.
Maybe it was HTBT depending on what move he actually made, but I'm guessing it looked enough like a pitching motion that the batter took a swing.

Pat
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 02, 2011, 07:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdem View Post
If the runner never actually broke for home, wouldn't this just be a balk.
The pitcher made a pitching motion while not on the rubber.
If that's what the umpire has, then it's a balk. The "assumption" in the OP is that the throwing motion was sufficiently different from the pitching motion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Base Awarded from the Pitch or Throw? TheUmp128 Baseball 5 Wed Apr 29, 2009 08:40pm
Fast pitch - batter "catches" the pitch Dakota Softball 16 Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:06am
Bats: Slow-pitch v. Fast-pitch Blu_IN Softball 3 Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:12pm
Slow Pitch, Fast Pitch, Baseball...they are all the same... Bandit Softball 5 Mon Jun 14, 2004 07:00pm
NFHS Rules. Two bases from the time of the Pitch or throw? Gre144 Baseball 1 Fri Mar 16, 2001 10:13am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1