The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 01, 2011, 01:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 253
Pitcher going to his mouth

Fed. Bases loaded, 2 outs. Pitcher in windup position. While on the rubber goes to his mouth, then wipes it off. Balk or no?

Case book 6.1.3 sit O has a balk in a similar situation but the interp is because he is to go directly to a set position.

Rule book 6-2-1-e has balk only if he does not wipe it off. No reference given to on the rubber or off.

Case book 6.2.1.a Has a ball on the batter if he is on the rubber.

Still I can find no cite in the rule book with a difference between on the rubber or off. Trying to settle a debate. Fellow official is on the side that it nothing because he is the windup. I am saying I have a balk. 6.2.1.a seems to back me up but I'm not afraid to be wrong and learn something new today!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 01, 2011, 03:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ulster County, NY
Posts: 125
In Fed baseball, if F1 is on the rubber with runners on, it is a balk if he goes to the mouth (regardless whether he wipes or not) unless there were allowances made (usually at the plate conference) for cold weather...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 01, 2011, 07:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggravy View Post
Still I can find no cite in the rule book with a difference between on the rubber or off.
Off the rubber and wipes: Legal

Off the rubber, doesn't wipe, then engages: Ball (regardless of runners)

On the rubber: Illegal Pitch-Ball (no runners) / Balk (with runners). It's simulating a pitching motion / coming set.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 01, 2011, 07:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Off the rubber and wipes: Legal

Off the rubber, doesn't wipe, then engages: Ball (regardless of runners)

On the rubber: Illegal Pitch-Ball (no runners) / Balk (with runners). It's simulating a pitching motion / coming set.
+1

From the windup (in FED), all F1 can do is step off or pitch to the batter. Going to his mouth is the start of the pitch, so he has "started and stopped." Balk.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 01:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 329
I agree that going to the mouth is a balk from the windup, but IMO the following case play (new in 2009) is inconsistent with the notion that "Going to his mouth is the start of the pitch."

*6.1.2 SITUATION D: F1, while on the pitcher’s plate in either the windup or set position, (a) adjusts his cap or (b) shakes off the signal with his glove, or (c) shakes off the signal with his head. RULING: In (a) through (c), these are legal actions if these movements of the arms and legs are not associated with the pitch.

It isn't obvious to me that going to the mouth is a noticeably different action than adjusting the cap.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 01:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Reed View Post
I agree that going to the mouth is a balk from the windup, but IMO the following case play (new in 2009) is inconsistent with the notion that "Going to his mouth is the start of the pitch."

*6.1.2 SITUATION D: F1, while on the pitcher’s plate in either the windup or set position, (a) adjusts his cap or (b) shakes off the signal with his glove, or (c) shakes off the signal with his head. RULING: In (a) through (c), these are legal actions if these movements of the arms and legs are not associated with the pitch.

It isn't obvious to me that going to the mouth is a noticeably different action than adjusting the cap.
I agree and argued the same last year. I could dig up the post, but that's a lot of work for nothing. Fed's statement that it's simulating the pitch is incorrect or inconsistent, as Dave pointed out.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 11:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 323
Regarding going to the mouth while on the rubber.

In the 2011 BRD, Carl points out that it is now legal for a pitcher, while in the windup or the set, to adjust his cap or shake off the signal with his glove or hand. This was changed in 2010. Prior to 2010 this was not legal. Case book 6.1.2d

Carl adds the following note: At last the NFHS has dropped the charade that going to the mouth on the rubber is illegal because the pitcher has interrupted his pitching motion. (There is more written about this note. See BRD 375).

So it is no longer linked with interrupting the pitching motion. It's simply a balk because it is a balk. This is an easier argument to make IMHO.
__________________
"That's all I have to say about that."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Somebody needs to ask FED how one can simulate a pitch/pitching motion with an empty hand.

Or is it that they assume the runners are that stupid.

Maybe I just answered the question.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 08:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest Ump View Post
Regarding going to the mouth while on the rubber.

In the 2011 BRD, Carl points out that it is now legal for a pitcher, while in the windup or the set, to adjust his cap or shake off the signal with his glove or hand. This was changed in 2010. Prior to 2010 this was not legal. Case book 6.1.2d

Carl adds the following note: At last the NFHS has dropped the charade that going to the mouth on the rubber is illegal because the pitcher has interrupted his pitching motion. (There is more written about this note. See BRD 375).

So it is no longer linked with interrupting the pitching motion. It's simply a balk because it is a balk. This is an easier argument to make IMHO.
I don't think they've dropped that charade. I think they're just inconsistent. And, it was pointed out on multiple threads on multiple boards the year the change was made. But, FED hasn't changed the cae to match.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 09:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Reed View Post
I agree that going to the mouth is a balk from the windup, but IMO the following case play (new in 2009) is inconsistent with the notion that "Going to his mouth is the start of the pitch."

*6.1.2 SITUATION D: F1, while on the pitcher’s plate in either the windup or set position, (a) adjusts his cap or (b) shakes off the signal with his glove, or (c) shakes off the signal with his head. RULING: In (a) through (c), these are legal actions if these movements of the arms and legs are not associated with the pitch.

It isn't obvious to me that going to the mouth is a noticeably different action than adjusting the cap.
Dave,

You are applying "logic" to understand a FED ruling. That's not "how they roll".

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 04, 2011, 10:01pm
I hate Illinois Nazis
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 157
Funny

I had to laugh when I got to the end of this thread. At the bottom, where it says "Similar Threads," is a thread I started three years ago where I argued, with no support from anybody, that going to the mouth did not simulate the start of a pitch. That thread was the only thread I have ever started, on any internet forum, that was locked.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 04, 2011, 10:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Lapopez,

Well, at least you've got the one!

Thanks for the trip down "memory lane".

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going to Mouth FED njdevs00cup Baseball 14 Mon Mar 30, 2009 09:54pm
FED Going to Mouth Lapopez Baseball 34 Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:51pm
Pitcher Goes to Mouth in the 18' circle dnorthen Baseball 8 Mon Apr 23, 2007 07:24pm
pitcher goes to his mouth without wiping it off coachnatte Baseball 5 Thu Jun 05, 2003 02:01pm
Pitcher goes to his mouth on plate...fed. ruling vs major league Vegaschuck Baseball 1 Tue Jul 24, 2001 02:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1